A Randomized Controlled Trial of Fluid Supplementation in Term Neonates With Severe Hyperbilirubinemia

2005 ◽  
Vol 147 (6) ◽  
pp. 781-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shailender Mehta ◽  
Praveen Kumar ◽  
Anil Narang
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (20) ◽  
pp. 2678-2684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prachi Goyal ◽  
Akshay Mehta ◽  
Jasbinder Kaur ◽  
Suksham Jain ◽  
Vishal Guglani ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helvi Ndeshihala Joel ◽  
Deborah Mchaile ◽  
Rune Philemon ◽  
Ronald Mbwasi ◽  
Levina Msuya

Abstract Background: Neonatal jaundice is one of the most common problems in newborns. Effective treatment of jaundice requires therapeutic intervention with phototherapy. Over recent years, several studies reported fiberoptic phototherapy to be less effective than conventional phototherapy in term neonates. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of fiberoptic phototherapy with a larger illuminated area and higher irradiance to conventional phototherapy methods. Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial conducted at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC). A total of 41 term neonates, less than 7 days of age with unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia were randomized. Thirteen (13) newborns were allocated to receive fiberoptic phototherapy, 13 to blue light conventional phototherapy and 15 to white light conventional phototherapy. Effectiveness was assessed by comparing the duration of phototherapy, bilirubin reduction rate and side effects of treatment. The data was analyzed with the independent t-test.Results: The mean overall bilirubin reduction rate was comparable in the fiberoptic phototherapy group (0.74%/h) and the blue light conventional phototherapy group (0.84%/h), with no statistically significant difference (p-value 0.124). However, white light conventional phototherapy had a significantly lower mean overall bilirubin reduction rate (0.29%/h) as compared to fiberoptic phototherapy (p-value <0.001). The mean treatment duration of phototherapy was 69 h, 68 h and 90 h in the fiberoptic, blue light conventional and white light conventional phototherapy groups respectively. Side effects such as loose stool and skin rash were noted in some participants who received conventional phototherapy. No side effects of treatment were noted in the fiberoptic phototherapy group.Conclusion: The effectiveness of fiberoptic PT and blue light conventional PT were comparable in terms of bilirubin reduction rate and treatment duration, whereas fiberoptic phototherapy was more effective than white light conventional PT, with a significantly lower bilirubin reduction rate and treatment duration. Fiberoptic phototherapy may mitigate side effects caused by conventional phototherapy.Trial registration: The Pan African Clinical Trial Registry, PACTR202004723570110. Registered 22nd April 2020- Retrospectively registered, http://www.pactr.org/


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document