OESOPHAGEAL ATRESIA WITH VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT: CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND LONG-TERM OUTCOME

Author(s):  
Antti I Koivusalo ◽  
Janne S Suominen ◽  
Mikko P Pakarinen
1989 ◽  
Vol 160 (3) ◽  
pp. 539-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lula O. Lubchenco ◽  
L. Joseph Butterfield ◽  
Virginia Delaney-Black ◽  
Edward Goldson ◽  
Beverly L. Koops ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magnus Westgren ◽  
Ingemar Ingemarsson ◽  
Hans Ahlström ◽  
Magnus Lindroth ◽  
Niels W. Svenningsen

2013 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 802-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Kobayashi ◽  
Salaam Sallaam ◽  
Sanjeev Aggarwal ◽  
Harinder R. Singh ◽  
Daniel R. Turner ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 465-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Valcamonico ◽  
P. Accorsi ◽  
C. Sanzeni ◽  
P. Martelli ◽  
P. La Boria ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-357
Author(s):  
HELEN HARRISON

To the Editor.— The authors of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development report on neonatal care1 found "important" variations among neonatal intensive care units in philosophies of treatment, methods of treatment, and short-term outcomes. In a recent meta-analysis of follow-up studies,2 researchers document a similarly haphazard approach to the long-term evaluation of very low birth weight survivors. Until randomized controlled clinical trials validate the safety and efficacy of neonatal therapies, and until long-term outcomes are assessed accurately, the treatment of very low birth weight infants should be declared experimental.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document