Moderators of cognitive insight outcome in metacognitive training for first-episode psychosis

Author(s):  
César González-Blanch ◽  
Irene Birulés ◽  
Esther Pousa ◽  
María Luisa Barrigon ◽  
Raquel López-Carrilero ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S44-S45
Author(s):  
Susana Ochoa ◽  
Raquel Lopez-Carrilero ◽  
Maria Luisa Barrigon ◽  
Esther Pousa ◽  
Eva Grasa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The individual Metacognitive Training (MCT+) is useful to reduce positive symptoms in people with schizophrenia, however less is known in people with first-episode psychosis (FEP). The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of MCT+ in FEP regarding symptoms and cognitive insight. Methods A random clinical trial was performed with people with FEP from 10 clinical centers of Spain. One group received ten sessions of MCT+ and the other group received TAU. A total of 75 patients were included in the study, however only 40 finished the final assessment. Patients were assessed before treatment, post-treatment and 6 month follow-up. The assessment includes a battery of instruments for the main aims the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Beck Cognitive Insight (BCIS) will be analyzed. Repeated measures statistical test were used in order to assess differences between groups. Results Both groups improved in Positive symptoms, in the MCT+ group the difference was 5.18 (SD=6.8) with a significance of p=0.002, while in the TAU group the difference was 3.38 (SD=4.9) with a significance of p=0.005. Regarding cognitive insight, in the MCT+ group patients improved in Self-reflectiveness, obtaining a score in baseline of 15.21 (SD=5.52) and 18 (SD=5.28) in post-treatment (p=0.017). The TAU group did not improve in any subscale of the BCIS. Discussion The MCT+ seems to improve more in positive symptoms than TAU, although both interventions diminished the presence of these symptoms. The MCT+ improved the self-reflectiveness, being one of the important areas for the understanding of the daily social functioning in relation to other. Further analysis should be explored.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Irene Birulés ◽  
Raquel López-Carrilero ◽  
Daniel Cuadras ◽  
Esther Pousa ◽  
Maria Barrigón ◽  
...  

Background: Metacognitive training (MCT) has demonstrated its efficacy in psychosis. However, the effect of each MCT session has not been studied. The aim of the study was to assess changes in cognitive insight after MCT: (a) between baseline, post-treatment, and follow-up; (b) after each session of the MCT controlled for intellectual quotient (IQ) and educational level. Method: A total of 65 patients with first-episode psychosis were included in the MCT group from nine centers of Spain. Patients were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and 6 months follow-up, as well as after each session of MCT with the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS). The BCIS contains two subscales: self-reflectiveness and self-certainty, and the Composite Index. Statistical analysis was performed using linear mixed models with repeated measures at different time points. Results: Self-certainty decreased significantly (p = 0.03) over time and the effect of IQ was negative and significant (p = 0.02). From session 4 to session 8, all sessions improved cognitive insight by significantly reducing self-certainty and the Composite Index. Conclusions: MCT intervention appears to have beneficial effects on cognitive insight by reducing self-certainty, especially after four sessions. Moreover, a minimum IQ is required to ensure benefits from MCT group intervention.


2020 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 516-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Salas-Sender ◽  
Raquel López-Carrilero ◽  
Ana Barajas ◽  
Esther Lorente-Rovira ◽  
Esther Pousa ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
M. Lepage ◽  
L. Buchy ◽  
M. Bodnar ◽  
M.C. Bertrand ◽  
R. Joober ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 215 (2) ◽  
pp. 308-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
César González-Blanch ◽  
Mario Álvarez-Jiménez ◽  
Rosa Ayesa-Arriola ◽  
Obdulia Martínez-García ◽  
Gema Pardo-García ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. O’Connor ◽  
Lyn Ellett ◽  
Olesya Ajnakina ◽  
Tabea Schoeler ◽  
Anna Kollliakou ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 1040-1049 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Buchy ◽  
Y. Czechowska ◽  
C. Chochol ◽  
A. Malla ◽  
R. Joober ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 149 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 70-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. O'Connor ◽  
Benjamin Wiffen ◽  
Marta DiForti ◽  
Laura Ferraro ◽  
Candice Joseph ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 552-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erkan Alkan ◽  
Geoff Davies ◽  
Kathryn Greenwood ◽  
Simon L H Evans

Abstract Metacognition is impaired in schizophrenia and is an important predictor of functional outcome, but the underlying neuropathology is not clear. Studies have implicated frontal regions and there is also some evidence that the hippocampus might play a pivotal role, but findings are inconsistent. We set out to more comprehensively investigate the neural underpinnings of insight in first-episode psychosis (FEP) using 2 metacognitive measures (the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale [BCIS]) and a perceptual metacognitive accuracy task alongside structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We measured cortical thickness in insula and frontal regions, hippocampal (including subfield) volumes, hippocampal microstructure (using neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging [NODDI]), and fractional anisotropy in fornix. Relative to controls, FEP showed poorer metacognitive accuracy, thinner cortex in frontal regions and lower fornix integrity. In healthy controls (but not FEP), metacognitive accuracy correlated with cortical thickness in frontal cortex and insula. Conversely, in FEP (but not controls), metacognitive accuracy correlated with hippocampal volume and microstructural indices. Subicular hippocampal subregions were particularly implicated. No structural correlates of BCIS were found. These findings suggest that the neural bases of metacognition might differ in FEP: hippocampal (rather than frontal) integrity seems to be critical. Further, the use of objectively measured metacognitive indices seems to be a more powerful method for understanding the neurocircuitry of metacognition in FEP, which has the potential to inform therapeutic strategies and improve outcome in these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document