Misalignment of the clavicle after intramedullary fixation of a midshaft fracture with a titanium elastic nail results in acute neurovascular thoracic outlet syndrome

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. e110-e114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jochen Gieger ◽  
Frank Beeres ◽  
Konrad Birrer ◽  
Reto Babst
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 2997-3002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaiying Shen ◽  
Yunlan Xu ◽  
Dan Cao ◽  
Zhigang Wang ◽  
Haiqing Cai

2020 ◽  
pp. 221049172097518
Author(s):  
Vineet Thomas Abraham ◽  
Chandrasekaran Marimuthu

Purpose: Fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle is well known to decrease nonunion, malunion and shoulder disability as compared to nonoperative treatment. This study was done to compare the clinical and functional outcome of group 1 clavicle fractures treated with anatomic locking plates (ALP) versus Titanium elastic nail (TEN). Methods: We studied patients presenting with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures treated with ALP or TEN. The study period was from Jan 2013 to Dec 2016. Patients were reviewed and at each visit clinical and radiological progress of union was noted, complications if any were noted, functional assessment was done using the quick Dash score and Constant Murley score. Results: A total of 116 patients met our inclusion criteria. 62 patients were treated with TEN and 54 with ALP. Bony union was achieved at an average of 11.8 weeks in the TENS group and 12.8 weeks in the ALP group post operatively and this was found to be significant. The mean postoperative Constant Murley score in the ALP and the TEN groups were 92.8 (range 80–97), and 93.7 (82–97) respectively. The mean postoperative quick dash score in the ALP and TEN groups were 2.48(range from 0 to 6.8) and 2.1 (range 0–9.1) respectively. Conclusion: Both Anatomical locking plate and TEN are good options for the treatment of non-comminuted mid clavicular fractures as they have a similar functional outcome. TEN nail insertion has the advantage of being minimally invasive, having a faster union time and may be recommended in midshaft clavicle fractures without comminution.


2016 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 49-53
Author(s):  
Hrushikesh Saraf ◽  
Sarang Kasture

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Ovidiu Adam ◽  
Vlad Laurentiu David ◽  
Florin George Horhat ◽  
Eugen Sorin Boia

Background and objectives: There are various methods in the management of forearm fractures in children. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing using Titanium Elastic Nail (TEN) is nowadays employed in diaphysis fractures of children, with clear benefits over other treatment options. However, in the case of TEN versus other treatment methods of forearm fractures in children, cost is an important issue. This report will focus on the cost assessment of using TEN versus other therapeutic means in the treatment of forearm fractures in children. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective longitudinal study of 173 consecutive patients with forearm fractures treated in a single institution during 2017. We calculated the cost for each patient by summing up direct costs plus indirect costs, calculated at an aggregate level. Hospital income data were extracted from the Diagnosis Related Groups database. Results: A total of 173 patients with forearm fractures were treated, 44 using TEN, 86 using K-wire, and 46 using closed reduction and cast. There were 66 radius fractures, 1 ulna fracture, and 106 that were both radius and ulna fractures. Mean treatment cost were $632.76 for TEN, $499.50 for K-wire, and $451.30 for closed reduction and cast. Costs for TEN were higher than for K-wire insertion (p = 0.00) and higher than closed reduction and cast ($182.42; p = 0.00). Reimbursement per patient was higher with TEN versus K-wire patients; $497.88 vs. $364.64 /patient (p = 0.00), and higher than for patients treated with closed reduction and cast (p = 0.00). Conclusions: The treatment of upper extremity fractures using TEN was more expensive than the other methods. In Romania, because the reimbursement for TEN is higher as well, there are no differences in the financial burden when treating forearm fractures with TEN versus K-wire. Non-surgical treatment has the lowest cost but also the lowest reimbursement.


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Cemalettin Aksoy ◽  
Omur Caglar ◽  
Mehmet Ayvaz ◽  
Muharrem Yazici ◽  
Ahmet Mumtaz Alpaslan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document