Evaluating single-case research data for systematic review: A commentary for the special issue

2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Maggin ◽  
Samuel L. Odom
2016 ◽  
Vol 97 (10) ◽  
pp. e106
Author(s):  
Robyn Tate ◽  
Linda Sigmundsdottir ◽  
Janet Doubleday ◽  
Ulrike Rosenkoetter ◽  
Donna Wakim ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Neely ◽  
Amarie Carnett ◽  
John Quarles ◽  
Se-Woong Park ◽  
Michelle Kelly

Abstract This review synthesizes the literature base evaluating the effects of behavior analytic interventions delivered via augmented reality (AR) technology for individuals with autism. We also conducted a quality review. We identified 14 studies with a majority of the studies (n = 11; 79%) utilizing single-case research design. Of the 14 studies, three met the quality criteria to be classified as “strong” and can offer evidence on the integration of AR technology into the practice of behavior analysis. All three studies taught a functional skill (i.e., tooth brushing and navigation). The remaining studies focused on skill acquisition with zero studies utilizing AR within the context of behavior assessment or behavior reduction interventions. This literature base is emerging with additional research required.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 491-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Wolfe ◽  
Erin E. Barton ◽  
Hedda Meadan

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 387-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rumen Manolov ◽  
Georgina Guilera ◽  
Antonio Solanas

The current text comments on three systematic reviews published in the special section Issues and Advances in the Systematic Review of Single-Case Research: An Update and Exemplars. The commentary is provided in relation to the need to combine the assessment of the methodological quality of the studies included in systematic reviews, the assessment of the presence of functional relations via visual analysis following objective rules, and the quantification of the magnitudes of effect, providing meaningful information. Although it was not required that the exemplars follow specific guidelines for conduct and reporting, we applied an existing methodological quality checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Finally, we point at specific signs of advance in the field of performing systematic reviews of single-case design studies, as identified in the three exemplars, and we also suggest some issues requiring further research and discussion.


2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie B. Barker ◽  
Stephen D. Mellalieu ◽  
Paul J. McCarthy ◽  
Marc V. Jones ◽  
Aidan Moran

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document