Preserving Duodenal Passage for Bone Mineralization: Billroth I versus Billroth II Reconstruction After Partial Gastrectomy in Growing Minipigs

2009 ◽  
Vol 155 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingmar Königsrainer ◽  
Alfred Königsrainer ◽  
Gerhard W. Maier
2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 994-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thuy B. Tran ◽  
David J. Worhunsky ◽  
Malcolm H. Squires ◽  
Linda X. Jin ◽  
Gaya Spolverato ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 681-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
RJLF Loffeld

Little is known about the long term occurrence and prevalence of upper abdominal complaints after previous partial gastrectomy. Therefore, a retrospective, uncontrolled, cross-sectional, descriptive, clinical, endoscopic study was done. A questionnaire was mailed to patients who had undergone partial gastrectomy and been sent for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Eight questions were scored on a five-point Likert scale, and a symptom score was calculated. During the five-year study period, 189 patients (137 men, 52 women) were identified as having had a partial gastrectomy -- 143 (76%) received the Billroth II operation and 46 (24%) received the Billroth I operation. The questionnaire was mailed to 124 patients, of whom 79 (64%) responded. Eighty-eight per cent of patients had undergone surgery more than 15 years earlier. Fifty-nine patients (75%) suffered from upper abdominal symptoms. Regurgitation of food, retrosternal heartburn and bile reflux occurred significantly more often in patients who underwent the Billroth II operation. The mean symptom score of patients who underwent Billroth I resection was significantly lower (4.5 [SD 3.6]) than that of patients who underwent Billroth II resection (7.1 [SD 4.4])(P=0.04). One or more symptoms indicative of dumping were found in 70% of patients who underwent Billroth II resection and in 59% of patients who underwent Billroth I resection (not significant). Many patients who had undergone a partial gastrectomy developed upper abdominal symptoms during long term follow-up that were not specifically linked to dumping.


1986 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 461-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Carboni ◽  
S. Guadagni ◽  
M. A. Pistoia ◽  
G. Amicucci ◽  
D. Tuscano ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Eun Park ◽  
Sang-Woon Kim

Abstract Background Survival rate of patients treated for gastric cancer has increased due to early detection and improvements of surgical technique and chemotherapy. Increase in survival rate has led to an increase in the risk for remnant gastric cancer (RGC). The purpose of this study was to investigate clinicopathologic features of RGC according to previous reconstruction method and factors affecting the interval from previous curative distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer to RGC occurrence. Methods Medical records of patients diagnosed with RGC at Yeungnam University Medical Center from January 2000 to December 2017 who had a history of distal gastrectomy with D2 LN dissection due to gastric cancer were reviewed retrospectively. Results Forty-eight patients were enrolled in this study. The mean interval of 48 RGC patients was 105.6 months (8.8 years). RGC after Billroth II reconstruction recurred more often at anastomosis site than RGC after Billroth I reconstruction (p = 0.001). The mean interval of RGC after Billroth I reconstruction was 67 months, shorter than 119 months of RGC after Billroth II reconstruction (p = 0.003). On the contrary, interval showed no difference according to stage of previous gastric cancer, remnant gastric cancer, or sex (p = 0.810, 0.145, and 0.372, respectively). Conclusions RGC after Billroth I reconstruction tends to arise earlier at non-anastomosis site than RGC after Billroth II. Therefore, we should examine non-anastomosis site carefully from the beginning of surveillance after gastric cancer surgery with Billroth I reconstruction for better outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document