Standardized Care and Oral Antibiotics on Discharge for Pediatric Perforated Appendicitis

Author(s):  
Sherif Emil
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S554-S554
Author(s):  
Tibisay I Villalobos-Fry ◽  
Mahlon Schaffer ◽  
Kristin H Wheatley

Abstract Background Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in pediatric medicine. Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been reported in up to 23% of intraoperative cultures though current recommendations do not specify the need for antipseudomonal coverage for preoperative treatment. Prior to transitioning the empiric antibiotic regimen used in the management of perforated appendicitis from an antipseudomonal agent to a simplified daily antibiotic regimen, we conducted a retrospective review of bacterial cultures obtained from intraabdominal fluid collections and antibiotic regimens in children that underwent surgical treatment of perforated appendicitis and/or intraabdominal abscesses. Methods A retrospective chart review of electronic medical records was conducted for pediatric patients admitted with a diagnosis of perforated appendicitis and/or intraabdominal abscess between April 1, 2016 and April 30, 2018. Results Seventy-two patients met inclusion criteria for the study with abscess identified prior to surgery in 11 patients (42.3%). Intraabdominal cultures were obtained in 48 patients (66.7%). The predominant organisms isolated were Escherichia coli, Bacteroides fragilis, and alpha-hemolytic Streptococcus. P. aeruginosa was identified in 12 (24%) cultures and never as a single organism. The majority of patients received piperacillin/tazobactam empirically (91.7%) with a median duration of 5 days (IQR 2). Forty-four patients (61.1%) received oral antibiotics to continue therapy after discharge and 75% received amoxicillin/clavulanate. Of the 12 patients with P. aeruginosa isolated, all patients received piperacillin/tazobactam empirically and 8 (66.7%) were transitioned to oral antibiotics to complete therapy, of which only two regimens retained antipseudomonal coverage. Conclusion Majority of intraabdominal cultures were polymicrobial and the isolation of P. aeruginosa did not appear to impact the choice of definitive antimicrobial therapy. The predominant organisms identified suggest that a non-antipseudomonal regimen (i.e., cephalosporin with metronidazole) may be considered for empiric antibiotic therapy for cases of perforated appendicitis. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori Handy ◽  
Rana F. Hamdy ◽  
Matthew Bryan ◽  
Daniele Dona ◽  
Evangelos Spyridakis ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Sujka ◽  
Katrina L. Weaver ◽  
Justin A. Sobrino ◽  
Ashwini Poola ◽  
Katherine W. Gonzalez ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 256 ◽  
pp. 56-60
Author(s):  
Alex J. Gordon ◽  
Jee-Hye Choi ◽  
Howard Ginsburg ◽  
Keith Kuenzler ◽  
Jason Fisher ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sandra Tomita ◽  
Jason Fisher ◽  
Howard Ginsburg ◽  
Keith Kuenzler ◽  
Jee-Hye Choi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S655-S655
Author(s):  
Robert F Bucayu ◽  
Alvaro Galvis ◽  
Rebecca John ◽  
Delma Nieves

Abstract Background Standard of care of nonoperative appendicitis patients involves ongoing antibiotic therapy. Yet, there is variability regarding the decision to continue outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment (OPAT) or transition to oral (PO) antibiotics. We review antibiotic susceptibility patterns aiming to help guide antibiotic choice and reduce the need for OPAT. Methods Single center retrospective study reviewing pediatric inpatients who underwent nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis with cultures obtained during drainage by Interventional Radiology (IR). We reviewed age, ethnicity, hospitalization length, antibiotic choice, route and duration, and culture data. Results Forty-six patients underwent nonoperative medical management for appendicitis (23[50%] 5-12 year olds (yo); 16[35%] 12-< 18yo; 23[50%] Latino;13[28%] White, 11[24%] Other; 5[11%] Asian; 1[2%] Black). Thirty-eight [83%] patients went home on OPAT, 6[13%] on PO, and 2[4%] completed therapy while inpatient. Time from admission to IR drainage was 1.9 ± 2.8 days (34[75%] within 24 hours of admission, 3[8%] within 24-48, and 2[5%] within 48-72). Duration of hospital stay was 9.7 ± 4 days (PO) and 5.9 ± 2.7 days (OPAT). Duration on antibiotics was 20 ± 9.3 (PO) and 18.4 ± 4.9 days (OPAT). Labs on admission and discharge are compared in Table 1. Eight [17%] patients were readmitted due to complications, 38[83%] went home with a drain, and 20[43%] had a fecalith on CT scan. Based on culture susceptibilities of the 38 OPAT patients, 29[76%] had oral antibiotics as an option. The three most common organisms in those sent home on OPAT included Enterococcus faecalis (38[100%]), Bacteroides spp (33[87%]) and Escherichia coli (27[71%]) (Figure 1). All patients who grew Pseudomonas aeruginosa had a PO option; similarly with 93% of E. coli, 81% of α-hemolytic Streptococcus spp, and 76% of E. faecalis. Conclusion Nearly 80% of patients sent home on OPAT had PO antibiotic regimens options based on the culture results & susceptibility profiles. This data indicates that using cultures and susceptibility data can help guide antibiotic management, significantly reducing PICC line placement and likely reduce healthcare costs and complications associated with central lines. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document