scholarly journals Patient-tailored aortic root repair in adult marfanoid patients: Surgical considerations and outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 155 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-51.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul P. Urbanski ◽  
Atanas Jankulowski ◽  
Aleksandra Morka ◽  
Vadim Irimie ◽  
Xiaochun Zhan ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 322-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gruschen R. Veldtman ◽  
Heidi M. Connolly ◽  
Thomas A. Orszulak ◽  
Joseph A. Dearani ◽  
Hartzell V. Schaff

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Ferrari ◽  
Martin Scoglio ◽  
Giulia Piazza ◽  
Francesco Maisano ◽  
Ludwig Karl von Segesser ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES Transcatheter aortic root repair is still not available because of the technical challenge of coronary perfusion. The use of chimney grafts for coronary ostia can be an option and we tested the flow-through coronary chimney grafts deployed in a 3-dimensional-printed root model as part of a transcatheter aortic root repair system. METHODS A 3-dimensional-printed root was used to test the coronary flow after the deployment of 1 root endograft (28 mm diameter) and two 6-mm diameter 10-cm long coronary chimney grafts. Continuous coronary flows were measured in a bench test at different pressure levels (60, 80 and 100 mmHg) and compared to target coronary flows (250 ml/min at rest for the left and 150 ml/min at rest for the right coronary artery). RESULTS The computed tomography scan-based root was modified with two 5-mm diameter coronary conduits to overcome the limits of the original 3-dimensional-printed coronary ostia. The root was placed in the hydrodynamic system: adjusted coronary free flow at 60, 80 and 100 mmHg of pressure was 1913, 2200 and 2480 ml/min for left coronary and 1633, 2026 and 2366 ml/min for right coronary, respectively. After endografts deployment, mean chimney graft flow at 60, 80 and 100 mmHg of pressure was 1053 ml/min (−45%), 1306 ml/min (−41%) and 1502 ml/min (−40%) for the left coronary and 1100 ml/min (−33%), 1460 ml/min (−28%) and 1626 ml/min (−31%) for the right coronary, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In this preliminary study, chimney grafts for transcatheter aortic root repair provided 830% of target flow in the right coronary (−31% of free flow) and 414% of target flow in the left coronary (−42% of free flow) which is more than sufficient for both coronaries in real-life conditions. The potential of this approach should be further explored with specifically designed endografts.


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Kumar ◽  
Steve Jones ◽  
U.M. Sivananthan ◽  
J.P. McGoldrick

2012 ◽  
Vol 143 (6) ◽  
pp. 1389-1395.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Kunihara ◽  
Diana Aicher ◽  
Svetlana Rodionycheva ◽  
Heinrich-Volker Groesdonk ◽  
Frank Langer ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1002-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changtian Wang ◽  
Mario Lachat ◽  
Evelyn Regar ◽  
Ludwig Karl von Segesser ◽  
Francesco Maisano ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L C Wang ◽  
Y X Liu ◽  
Y J Dun ◽  
X G Sun

Abstract Background Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is the most common catastrophic aortic event. Most ATAAD involves the aortic root which has many important anatomical structures such as aortic valve, so the proper treatment of dissected root can ensure a good prognosis for patients. However, there is still no consensus on root management strategies for ATAAD patients with aortic root involvement. Purpose This clinical study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of modified aortic root repair in ATAAD. Methods From September 2017 to September 2020, Participants with root involvement of ATAAD were recruited who underwent modified aortic root repair as well as some additional procedure such as aortic valve junction suspension plasty based on the aortic sinus tear extent. During this novel procedure, the proximal anastomosis plane was at the level of the sinu-tubular junction and the false lumen below it was retained. We collected and analyzed the perioperative clinical data and follow-up imaging data of patients, and further evaluated the early and mid-term efficacy of this surgical approach. Results A total of 79 patients were enrolled, including 59 males and 20 females, the age was (52.4±11.3) years old (28–73 years), the diameter of aortic sinus was (38.6±4.1) mm, and the diameter of sinu-tubular junction was (41.8±4.8) mm. In this group, 75 patients (94.9%) received ascending aorta replacement, total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk, 2 patients (2.5%) received ascending aorta replacement and hybrid total arch replacement, 2 patients (2.5%) received ascending aorta replacement and partial arch replacement. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was (197.2±58.6) min (118–455 min), blocking time was (132.6±38.9) min (73–323 min), circulatory arrest time was (10.3±7.0) min (0–27 min). There was no perioperative death, no paraplegia, one secondary thoracotomy, five renal failures needing hemodialysis treatment and two cerebral infarctions. Before patients discharged, aortic CTA showed that the residual false lumen in the sinus disappeared. And the diameter of the aortic sinus was (35.5±3.1) mm, the diameter of the junction of the aortic sinus was (30.0±3.0) mm. The patients were followed up for (18±12) months (3–35 months). There was one patient died during follow-up and no further surgical intervention at the root of the aorta. Follow-up aortic CTA showed no residual or new dissection in the aortic sinus and no significant difference in the diameters of aortic sinu-tubular junction (P=0.122) or aortic sinus (P=0.37) between postoperative period and follow-up period. Echocardiography showed that the structure and function of the aortic valve were normal. Conclusions The modified aortic root repair for ATAAD is relatively simple, easy to learn and safe in perioperative period. Early and mid-term follow-up image examination showed that the structure of aortic sinus returned to normal. The long-term clinical effect requires close attention. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Modified aortic root repair procedure Aortic root diameter change under CTA


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document