Fate of Bicuspid Aortic Valves in Patients Undergoing Aortic Root Repair or Replacement for Aortic Root Enlargement

2006 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 322-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gruschen R. Veldtman ◽  
Heidi M. Connolly ◽  
Thomas A. Orszulak ◽  
Joseph A. Dearani ◽  
Hartzell V. Schaff
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Ferrari ◽  
Martin Scoglio ◽  
Giulia Piazza ◽  
Francesco Maisano ◽  
Ludwig Karl von Segesser ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES Transcatheter aortic root repair is still not available because of the technical challenge of coronary perfusion. The use of chimney grafts for coronary ostia can be an option and we tested the flow-through coronary chimney grafts deployed in a 3-dimensional-printed root model as part of a transcatheter aortic root repair system. METHODS A 3-dimensional-printed root was used to test the coronary flow after the deployment of 1 root endograft (28 mm diameter) and two 6-mm diameter 10-cm long coronary chimney grafts. Continuous coronary flows were measured in a bench test at different pressure levels (60, 80 and 100 mmHg) and compared to target coronary flows (250 ml/min at rest for the left and 150 ml/min at rest for the right coronary artery). RESULTS The computed tomography scan-based root was modified with two 5-mm diameter coronary conduits to overcome the limits of the original 3-dimensional-printed coronary ostia. The root was placed in the hydrodynamic system: adjusted coronary free flow at 60, 80 and 100 mmHg of pressure was 1913, 2200 and 2480 ml/min for left coronary and 1633, 2026 and 2366 ml/min for right coronary, respectively. After endografts deployment, mean chimney graft flow at 60, 80 and 100 mmHg of pressure was 1053 ml/min (−45%), 1306 ml/min (−41%) and 1502 ml/min (−40%) for the left coronary and 1100 ml/min (−33%), 1460 ml/min (−28%) and 1626 ml/min (−31%) for the right coronary, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In this preliminary study, chimney grafts for transcatheter aortic root repair provided 830% of target flow in the right coronary (−31% of free flow) and 414% of target flow in the left coronary (−42% of free flow) which is more than sufficient for both coronaries in real-life conditions. The potential of this approach should be further explored with specifically designed endografts.


2004 ◽  
Vol 128 (5) ◽  
pp. 662-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Aicher ◽  
Frank Langer ◽  
Anke Kissinger ◽  
Henning Lausberg ◽  
Roland Fries ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 150 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth H. Stephens ◽  
Thomas A. Hope ◽  
Fabian A. Kari ◽  
John-Peder Escobar Kvitting ◽  
David H. Liang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 155 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-51.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul P. Urbanski ◽  
Atanas Jankulowski ◽  
Aleksandra Morka ◽  
Vadim Irimie ◽  
Xiaochun Zhan ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Kumar ◽  
Steve Jones ◽  
U.M. Sivananthan ◽  
J.P. McGoldrick

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob C Hartz ◽  
Laura Mansfield ◽  
David Brown ◽  
Jonathan Rhodes

Introduction: Central arterial pressure rises to much higher levels during heavy isometric exercise compared to other forms of exercise. For this reason, patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) are often restricted from heavy isometric exercise. Although this approach may be theoretically appealing, no data exists regarding the efficacy of this activity restriction. Methods: Patients between the 12-19 years old with BAV were approached during a routine clinic visit. Patients were excluded if they had a diagnosed syndrome or had undergone a procedure involving the aortic valve. Patients were assumed to have been exercise restricted, regardless of aortic dimensions. Patients completed a questionnaire regarding frequency and intensity of isometric exercise during the 12-month period prior to the visit. We then compared aortic dimensions and qualitative (1-4 scale) estimates of aortic insufficiency (AI) from an echocardiogram performed during the current visit and one obtained 2-5 years previously, using paired t-tests and multivariable regression controlling for age, gender, and participation in isometric exercise. Results: In this unique data set of 37 individuals (41% female, average age 14.8 years), 6 (16%) participated in isometric exercise. There was no significant increase in the aortic root Z-score (0.004 [95 th CI -0.20, 0.21) or in the ascending aorta Z-score (0.11 [95 th CI, -0.15, 0.37], p=0.4) between the first and second visits. Further, there was no differences in the change aortic root Z-score (β=-0.39, p=0.39) and ascending aorta Z-score (β=-0.30, p-0.699) between those who participated in isometric exercise and those who did not. However, although the sample size in this preliminary group of patients was small, the increase in AI severity among those participating in isometric exercise was clinically significant and approached statistical significance (β=0.37, p=0.1). These results did not change even after controlling for age, gender, and time between echocardiograms. Conclusion: Most adolescents with BAV follow recommendations to limit isometric exercise. Time-related changes in aortic dimensions were similar among patients who refrained from isometric exercise and those who engaged in isometric exercise. AI however may have progressed more rapidly in those who participated in isometric exercise.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document