scholarly journals Commentary: Physician Payment under CMS: A Global Storm Looms on the Horizon

Author(s):  
Joseph C. Cleveland
Keyword(s):  
2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (15) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
JENNIFER SILVERMAN
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Rowland W Pettit ◽  
Jordan Kaplan ◽  
Matthew M Delancy ◽  
Edward Reece ◽  
Sebastian Winocour ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Open Payments Program, as designated by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act is the single largest repository of industry payments made to licensed physicians within the United States. Though sizeable in its dataset, the database and user interface are limited in their ability to permit expansive data interpretation and summarization. Objectives We sought to comprehensively compare industry payments made to plastic surgeons with payments made to all surgeons and all physicians to elucidate industry relationships since implementation. Methods The Open Payments Database was queried between 2014 and 2019, and inclusion criteria were applied. These data were evaluated in aggregate and for yearly totals, payment type, and geographic distribution. Results 61,000,728 unique payments totaling $11,815,248,549 were identified over the six-year study period. 9,089 plastic surgeons, 121,151 surgeons, and 796,260 total physicians received these payments. Plastic surgeons annually received significantly less payment than all surgeons (p=0.0005). However, plastic surgeons did not receive significantly more payment than all physicians (p = 0.0840). Cash and cash equivalents proved to be the most common form of payment; Stock and stock options were least commonly transferred. Plastic surgeons in Tennessee received the most in payments between 2014-2019 (mean $ 76,420.75). California had the greatest number of plastic surgeons to receive payments (1,452 surgeons). Conclusions Plastic surgeons received more in industry payments than the average of all physicians but received less than all surgeons. The most common payment was cash transactions. Over the past six years, geographic trends in industry payments have remained stable.


JAMA ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 272 (24) ◽  
pp. 1890
Author(s):  
Bruce C. Vladeċk

1989 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 76-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor G. Rodwin

2002 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan M. Scarrow

Payment for physician services in the United States is directly tied to the payment system implemented in the Medicare system. The use of a code to categorize medical and surgical services, as well as a relative value system to assess physician services and reimburse them accordingly, is now well established. In light of this, it is important for physicians to possess knowledge of how this coding and reimbursement system was established, how it is updated, what means are available to modify it, and how it is used in practice. The author addresses these issues, offering a primer for the neurosurgeon on the Medicare system as it relates to physician payment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 195 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Mazur ◽  
Mary Kate Keeter ◽  
Christopher Morrison ◽  
Andrew Choi ◽  
Jared Moss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 161 (12) ◽  
pp. 915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie R. Morain ◽  
Charles Flexner ◽  
Nancy E. Kass ◽  
Jeremy Sugarman
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document