scholarly journals MA05.10 Performance of Draft 2020 USPSTF Lung-Cancer Screening Guidelines and Potential for use of Risk Models to Reduce Racial/Ethnic Disparities

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. S151
Author(s):  
R. Landy ◽  
C. Young ◽  
M. Skarzynski ◽  
L. Cheung ◽  
C. Berg ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Landy ◽  
Corey D Young ◽  
Martin Skarzynski ◽  
Li C Cheung ◽  
Christine D Berg ◽  
...  

Abstract We examined whether draft 2020 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) lung-cancer screening recommendations “partially ameliorate racial disparities in screening eligibility” compared to 2013 guidelines, as claimed. Using data from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey, USPSTF-2020 increased eligibility by similar proportions for minorities (97.1%) and Whites (78.3%). Contrary to the intent of USPSTF-2020, the relative disparity (differences in percentages of model-estimated gainable life-years from National Lung Screening Trial-like screening by eligible Whites vs minorities) actually increased from USPSTF-2013 to USPSTF-2020 (African Americans: 48.3%–33.4%=15.0% to 64.5%–48.5%=16.0%; Asian Americans: 48.3%–35.6%=12.7% to 64.5%–45.2%=19.3%; Hispanic Americans: 48.3%–24.8%=23.5% to 64.5%–37.0%=27.5%). However, augmenting USPSTF-2020 with high-benefit individuals selected by the Life-Years From Screening with Computed Tomography (LYFS-CT) model nearly eliminated disparities for African Americans (76.8%–75.5%=1.2%), and improved screening efficiency for Asian/Hispanic Americans, although disparities were reduced only slightly (Hispanic Americans) or unchanged (Asian Americans). Draft USPSTF-2020 guidelines increased the number of eligible minorities versus USPSTF-2013 but may inadvertently increase racial/ethnic disparities. LYFS-CT could reduce disparities in screening eligibility by identifying ineligible people with high predicted benefit, regardless of race/ethnicity.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Landy ◽  
Corey D. Young ◽  
Martin Skarzynski ◽  
Li C. Cheung ◽  
Christine D. Berg ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. S1173-S1174
Author(s):  
C. Olazagasti ◽  
A. Velazquez ◽  
M. Ehrlich ◽  
N. Kohn ◽  
N. Seetharamu

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra L. Potter ◽  
Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang ◽  
Kirsten M. Woolpert ◽  
Thrusha Puttaraju ◽  
Kei Suzuki ◽  
...  

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 1318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melinda C. Aldrich ◽  
Sarah F. Mercaldo ◽  
Kim L. Sandler ◽  
William J. Blot ◽  
Eric L. Grogan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Christine D. Berg ◽  
Denise R. Aberle ◽  
Douglas E. Wood

OVERVIEW: The results of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) have provided the medical community and American public with considerable optimism about the potential to reduce lung cancer mortality with imaging-based screening. Designed as a randomized trial, the NLST has provided the first evidence of screening benefit by showing a 20% reduction in lung cancer mortality and a 6.7% reduction in all-cause mortality with low dose helical computed tomography (LDCT) screening relative to chest X-ray. The major harms of LDCT screening include the potential for radiation-induced carcinogenesis; high false-positivity rates in individuals without lung cancer, and overdiagnosis. Following the results of the NLST, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) published the first of multiple lung cancer screening guidelines under development by major medical organizations. These recommendations amalgamated screening cohorts, practices, interpretations, and diagnostic follow-up based on the NLST and other published studies to provide guidance for the implementation of LDCT screening. There are major areas of opportunity to optimize implementation. These include standardizing practices in the screening setting, optimizing risk profiles for screening and for managing diagnostic evaluation in individuals with indeterminate nodules, developing interdisciplinary screening programs in conjunction with smoking cessation, and approaching all stakeholders systematically to ensure the broadest education and dissemination of screening benefits relative to risks. The incorporation of validated biomarkers of risk and preclinical lung cancer can substantially enhance the effectiveness screening programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document