1358 PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE AJUST SINGLE INCISION TRANSOBTURATOR SLING PROCEDURE FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE IN WOMEN: RESULTS OVER ONE YEAR FOLLOW-UP

2012 ◽  
Vol 187 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Nicolas Cornu ◽  
Ariela Skurnik ◽  
Calin Ciofu ◽  
Laurence Peyrat ◽  
Vincent Lucente ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1265-1270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Nicolas Cornu ◽  
Laurence Peyrat ◽  
Ariela Skurnik ◽  
Calin Ciofu ◽  
Vincent R. Lucente ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 110-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Moore ◽  
John Miklos ◽  
L. Dean Knoll ◽  
Mary Dupont ◽  
Mickey Karram ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Schütze ◽  
Ulf Göretzlehner ◽  
Elisabeth Mian ◽  
Fabienne Schochter ◽  
Wolfgang Janni ◽  
...  

In the literature the rate of stress incontinence is reported between 29-75%. Compared to the established tension free vaginal tapes, the question arises, whether stabilization of the urethra can also be achieved by minimally invasive single incision slings. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to evaluate the cure rate after insertion of MicroGYNious sling. The study was carried out on 115 patients, who received a MicroGYNious sling. It was used both as a single operation for stress urinary incontinence and as a combined procedure. The degree of incontinence preoperatively and continence rate postoperatively with follow-ups (6 weeks, 6 months, one year, two years and three years) were recorded. Due to a high number of lost to follow-up after one year, only the data up to one year postoperative were included in the analysis. Preoperatively, grade I incontinence was found in 6.1%, grade II 35.7%, grade III 58.3% of the operated women. The continence rate was 96.7% postoperatively, 90 % after 6 weeks, 87.2 % after 6 months, 86.7% after one year. In terms of continence rates, the MicroGYNious sling shows similar results compared to the established procedures. Therefore, this sling provides a good treatment option for the stress urinary incontinence. These good results must be confirmed in prospective randomized trials.


Author(s):  
Pedro Rincon Cintra da Cruz ◽  
Aderivaldo Cabral Dias Filho ◽  
Gabriel Nardi Furtado ◽  
Rhaniellen Silva Ferreira ◽  
Ceres Nunes Resende

Abstract Objective To evaluate whether performing preoperative urodynamic study influences postoperative urinary symptoms of women with stress urinary incontinence that underwent transobturator sling. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients treated for stress urinary incontinence by transobturator sling from August 2011 to October 2018. Predictor variables included preoperative urodynamic study, age, incontinence severity, body mass index, preoperative storage symptoms and previous anti-urinary incontinence procedure. Outcome variables were postoperative subjective continence status, storage symptoms and complications. Logistic regression after propensity score was employed to compare outcomes between patients who underwent or not pre-operative urodynamic study. Results The present study included 88 patients with an average follow-up of 269 days. Most patients (n = 52; 59.1%) described storage symptoms other than stress urinary incontinence, and 38 patients (43.2%) underwent preoperative urodynamic studies. Logistic regression after propensity score did not reveal an association between urinary continence outcomes and performance of preoperative urodynamic study (odds ratio 0.57; confidence interval [CI]: 0.11–2.49). Among women that did not undergo urodynamic study, there was a subjective improvement in urinary incontinence in 92% of the cases versus 87% in those that underwent urodynamic study (p = 0.461). Furthermore, postoperative storage symptoms were similar between women who did not undergo urodynamic study and those who underwent urodynamic study, 13.2% versus 18.4%, respectively (p = 0.753). Conclusion Preoperative urodynamic study had no impact on urinary incontinence cure outcomes as well as on urinary storage symptoms after the transobturator sling in women with stress urinary incontinence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document