134 COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SHOCK WAVE FREQUENCIES OF 60 VERSUS 120 SHOCKS PER MINUTE FOR TREATMENT OF UPPER URETERAL STONES: ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL

2012 ◽  
Vol 187 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary Klinghoffer ◽  
Vincent Tu ◽  
Kenneth Pace
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Economic Analysis ◽  
Ureteral Stones ◽  
Double Blind Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Trial

A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial to Compare Shock Wave Frequencies of 60 and 120 Shocks per Minute for Upper Ureteral Stones

2009 ◽  
Vol 182 (4) ◽  
pp. 1418-1423 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J.D.'A. Honey ◽  
T.D. Schuler ◽  
D. Ghiculete ◽  
K.T. Pace ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Ureteral Stones ◽  
Double Blind Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Trial

scholarly journals Double-Blind Trial Comparing Epidural Lignocaine with Epidural Fentanyl for Anaesthesia during Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy

1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. S. Silbert ◽  
R. Kluger ◽  
A. C. Meads ◽  
K. Stasytis
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy ◽  
Shock Wave Lithotripsy ◽  
Epidural Fentanyl ◽  
Double Blind Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Trial ◽  
Extracorporeal Shock Wave ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fentanyl Group

A randomised double-blind trial was undertaken to compare epidural lignocaine 1.5% with adrenaline to epidural fentanyl (100μg in saline 10 ml) in forty unpremedicated patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy without ancillary procedures. Midazolam only was used for sedation. There was no significant difference in intraoperative pain scores with several patients in each group complaining of pain. Decreases in blood pressure occurred in both groups but were more pronounced in the lignocaine groups (36% vs 25 % maximum decrease from control, P = 0.004). Heart rate was increased in the lignocaine group compared with control and to the fentanyl group, but there was no difference in respiratory rates within or between groups. Pruritis was more common in the fentanyl group and leg heaviness in the lignocaine group, but neither was troublesome. There was no difference in urological outcome at one month. Both techniques were satisfactory for the majority of patients, but the fentanyl group had a shorter preparation time and less cardiovascular changes.

SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY AT 60 OR 120 SHOCKS PER MINUTE: A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL

2005 ◽  
Vol 174 (2) ◽  
pp. 595-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
KENNETH T. PACE ◽  
DANIELA GHICULETE ◽  
MELANIE HARJU ◽  
R. JOHN D'A. HONEY ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Shock Wave Lithotripsy ◽  
Double Blind Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Trial

A randomized, double-blind trial of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of clozapine

1997 ◽  
Vol 24 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Rosenheck ◽  
Dennis Charney ◽  
Joyce Cramer ◽  
Weichun Xu ◽  
Jonathan Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Double Blind Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Trial

Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Randomized, Double-blind Trial to Compare Immediate Versus Delayed Voltage Escalation

Urology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. John D'A. Honey ◽  
A. Andrew Ray ◽  
Daniela Ghiculete ◽  
Kenneth T. Pace
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Shock Wave Lithotripsy ◽  
Double Blind Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Trial
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document