scholarly journals 4:03 PM Abstract No. 215 Trends in interventional radiology: survey of medical students at an educational symposium

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. S98
Author(s):  
N. Jain ◽  
S. O’Neill ◽  
V. Chandra ◽  
S. Sokalaw ◽  
A. Kumar ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Jain ◽  
Sean O’Neill ◽  
Vishnu Chandra ◽  
Slavamir Sokalaw ◽  
Aisha Alam ◽  
...  

Objective: Symposiums are great avenues to expose students to interventional radiology (IR) and gauge their interest in the field. This study compares student interest and knowledge of the specialty before and after a state- wide IR symposium. Materials and Methods: A state-wide IR symposium consisted of lecture didactics and interactive hands-on IR simulations. Pre-symposium and post-symposium survey assessments were provided to each attendee to complete. The surveys remained anonymous and were performed for quality assurance purposes. The survey included questions on knowledge of IR, interest in IR, application strategies for the IR match, and career options in IR. Results: A total of 101 medical students registered for the symposium. Thirty-nine completed the pre-symposium survey and 40 completed the post-symposium survey. About 71.1% of the respondents reported “Little Knowledge” of IR before the symposium, which decreased to 40.5% after the symposium. Furthermore, 21% of the respondents believed that they had a “Good Foundation” in IR before the symposium and 59.5% after the symposium (P < 0.0001). The percentage of students planning to pursue IR increased from 35.9% to 45.9% (P = 0.160) after the symposium. About 77.8% reported that having an IR clinic is important in their career in the post-symposium survey compared to 64.1% in the pre-symposium survey (P = 0.077). Conclusions: Symposiums are an effective method in exposing medical students to IR. Students have expressed both strong interest in the field and increased knowledge post-symposium. Prospective applicants have reported dual applying to the integrated IR and diagnostic radiology (DR) residencies due to their concern about the competitive nature of integrated IR due to small number of positions available.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Auloge ◽  
Julien Garnon ◽  
Joey Marie Robinson ◽  
Sarah Dbouk ◽  
Jean Sibilia ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To assess awareness and knowledge of Interventional Radiology (IR) in a large population of medical students in 2019. Methods An anonymous survey was distributed electronically to 9546 medical students from first to sixth year at three European medical schools. The survey contained 14 questions, including two general questions on diagnostic radiology (DR) and artificial intelligence (AI), and 11 on IR. Responses were analyzed for all students and compared between preclinical (PCs) (first to third year) and clinical phase (Cs) (fourth to sixth year) of medical school. Of 9546 students, 1459 students (15.3%) answered the survey. Results On DR questions, 34.8% answered that AI is a threat for radiologists (PCs: 246/725 (33.9%); Cs: 248/734 (36%)) and 91.1% thought that radiology has a future (PCs: 668/725 (92.1%); Cs: 657/734 (89.5%)). On IR questions, 80.8% (1179/1459) students had already heard of IR; 75.7% (1104/1459) stated that their knowledge of IR wasn’t as good as the other specialties and 80% would like more lectures on IR. Finally, 24.2% (353/1459) indicated an interest in a career in IR with a majority of women in preclinical phase, but this trend reverses in clinical phase. Conclusions Development of new technology supporting advances in artificial intelligence will likely continue to change the landscape of radiology; however, medical students remain confident in the need for specialty-trained human physicians in the future of radiology as a clinical practice. A large majority of medical students would like more information about IR in their medical curriculum; almost a quarter of students would be interested in a career in IR.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 4656-4663
Author(s):  
Fabian Stoehr ◽  
Sebastian Schotten ◽  
Michael B. Pitton ◽  
Christoph Dueber ◽  
Franziska Schmidt ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. S165-S166
Author(s):  
D.A. Eckstein ◽  
O. Hasan ◽  
A. DePalma ◽  
K. Shah ◽  
P. Murillo ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. S36 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.W. Commander ◽  
R. Dixon ◽  
H. Yu ◽  
A. Isaacson ◽  
C.T. Burke

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 965-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric King ◽  
Nicholson Chadwick ◽  
Andrew Lee ◽  
Nicole Keefe ◽  
Rahul Nayyar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document