scholarly journals A generic model for the shallow velocity structure of volcanoes

2018 ◽  
Vol 356 ◽  
pp. 114-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Lesage ◽  
Michael J. Heap ◽  
Alexandra Kushnir
2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 907-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. García-Jerez ◽  
M. Navarro ◽  
F.J. Alcalá ◽  
F. Luzón ◽  
J.A. Pérez-Ruiz ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 252-261
Author(s):  
Ming Zhou ◽  
◽  
Xiaofeng Tian ◽  
Fuyun Wang ◽  
Yunhao Wei ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1427-1438
Author(s):  
Shuei-Huei You ◽  
Konstantinos I. Konstantinou ◽  
Yuancheng Gung ◽  
Cheng-Horng Lin

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 502-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geng-xin Yu ◽  
Hai Lou ◽  
Chun-yong Wang ◽  
Li-yun Fu ◽  
Jian-guo Zhang ◽  
...  

Geophysics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 1726-1737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Zhang ◽  
M. Nafi Toksöz

A few important issues for performing nonlinear refraction traveltime tomography have been identified. They include the accuracy of the traveltime and raypath calculations for refraction, the physical information in the refraction traveltime curves, and the characteristics of the refraction traveltime errors. Consequently, we develop a shortest path ray‐tracing method with an optimized node distribution that can calculate refraction traveltimes and raypaths accurately in any velocity model. We find that structure ambiguity caused by short and long rays in the seismic refraction method may influence the inversion solution significantly. Therefore, we pose a nonlinear inverse problem that explicitly minimizes the misfits of the average slownesses (ratios of traveltimes to the corresponding ray lengths) and the apparent slownesses (derivatives of traveltimes with respect to distance). As a result, we enhance the resolution as well as the convergence speed. To regularize our inverse problem, we use the Tikhonov method to avoid solving an ill‐posed inverse problem. Errors in refraction traveltimes are characterized in terms of a common‐shot error, a constant deviation for recordings from the same shot, and a relative traveltime‐gradient error with zero mean with respect to the true gradient of the traveltime curve. Therefore, we measure the uncertainty of our tomography solution using a nonlinear Monte Carlo approach and compute the posterior model covariance associated with two different types of random data vectors and one random model vector. The nonlinear uncertainty analysis indicates that the resolution of a tomography solution may not correspond to the ray coverage. We apply this tomography technique to image the shallow velocity structure at a coastal site near Boston, Massachusetts. The results are consistent with a subsequent drilling survey.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva P. S. Eibl ◽  
Gilda Currenti ◽  
Joachim Wassermann ◽  
Philippe Jousset ◽  
Daniel Vollmer ◽  
...  

<p>Rotational seismology is an emerging field of seismology with rotational sensors such as blueSeis-3A as portable devices. We deployed one of these rotational sensors on Etna volcano from August to September 2019 in the middle of a 26 stations broadband seismic array and a fibre-optic cable deployed for Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS). We, therefore, recorded continuously the full seismic wavefield using a 6C station (rotational sensor co-located with a broadband seismometer) for 30 days.</p><p>We will present an overview of our work on the rotational data in combination with a broadband seismometer. We will (i) compare the translational with rotational data and show how they complement each other, (ii) calculate back azimuths using only a 6C station or using merely the horizontal components of the rotational sensor, (iii) determine Love and Rayleigh wave velocities from the rotation rate and (iv) perform a simple inversion for the shallow velocity structure below the station, and finally (v) discuss the usefulness of such a sensor in a volcanic environment and (vi) highlight what new it would bring to volcano-related research.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document