scholarly journals A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Asymptomatic Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) vs Combined CEA-CABG in the ACS-NSQIP

2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 563
Author(s):  
Li Wang ◽  
Thomas Curran ◽  
John C. McCallum ◽  
Dominique Buck ◽  
Jeremy Darling ◽  
...  
1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 836-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoyuki YANAKA ◽  
Kotoo MEGURO ◽  
Kiyoshi NARUSHIMA ◽  
Ikuo FUKUDA ◽  
Yuichi NOGUCHI ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideo SHICHINOHE ◽  
Kiyohiro HOUKIN ◽  
Satoshi KURODA ◽  
Tatsuya ISHIKAWA ◽  
Hiroshi ABE ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Wada ◽  
Y Shiono ◽  
D Higashioka ◽  
M Kashiwagi ◽  
K Shimamura ◽  
...  

Abstract Background It has been reported that preoperative fractional flow reserve (FFR) is associated with graft patency after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and the patency is excellent when a bypass graft is anastomosed on a vessel with positive FFR. However, the association with graft patency has not yet been investigated in its novel counterpart, instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and iFR sometimes contradicts FFR results. Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess an impact of preoperative iFR on a graft failure after CABG in patients with coronary arteries showing positive FFR (≤0.80). Methods We retrospectively identified patients who had undergone preoperative coronary angiography in conjunction with resting and hyperemic intra-coronary pressure measurements, CABG, and graft evaluation by coronary computed tomography angiography. After excluding vessels with negative FFR (>0.80), vessels were divided into two groups: negative iFR group (iFR >0.89) and positive iFR group (iFR ≤0.89). The rate of graft failure within 1 year after CABG was compared between the two groups. Results We analyzed 131 vessels in 89 patients (35 vessels in the negative iFR group and 96 vessels in the positive iFR group). The negative iFR group showed significantly higher iFR (0.92±0.02 vs. 0.74±0.13, P<0.0001) and FFR (0.72±0.06 vs. 0.63±0.09, P<0.0001) than the positive iFR group, although percent diameter stenosis (%DS) was comparable (57±10 vs. 56±9, P=0.47). The graft failure significantly often occurred in the negative iFR group than in the positive iFR group (28.6% vs. 8.3%, P=0.0029). In order to reduce the imbalance in the baseline characteristics except for iFR, 70 vessels were selected by using propensity score matching (n=35 in each group). The propensity score matched vessels also demonstrated significantly higher rate of graft failure in the negative iFR group than in the positive iFR group (28.6% vs. 5.7%, p=0.026) despite much more balanced FFR (0.72±0.06 vs. 0.69±0.07, p=0.02) and %DS (57±10 vs. 57±9, p=1.000). Conclusions Even when FFR is positive, the graft failure is likely to occur when a bypass graft is anastomosed on a vessel with negative iFR compared to a vessel with positive iFR. Acknowledgement/Funding None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document