scholarly journals UEV 1. Long-term Complications of Central Venous Access Catheters: A Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. e168
Author(s):  
John T. Loree ◽  
David J. Pinter ◽  
Palma M. Shaw
1998 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-40
Author(s):  
Franco Tesio ◽  
Hamurabi De Baz ◽  
Giacomo Panarello

1998 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franco Tesio ◽  
Hamurabi De Baz ◽  
Giacomo Panarello

2019 ◽  
pp. 177-190
Author(s):  
Richard Craig

In this chapter, the use of ultrasound to facilitate cannulation of a vessel is described in detail, including commentaries on equipment, preparation, scanning, and needling technique. Equipment and techniques for the insertion of short-term non-tunnelled central lines, long-term central venous access devices, arterial lines, and intraosseous needles are presented.


2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982094759
Author(s):  
Fulvio Pinelli ◽  
Paolo Balsorano ◽  
Benedetta Mura ◽  
Mauro Pittiruti

Catheter-related thrombosis represents one of the most common complications following central venous access insertion. Despite the amount of available studies, many aspects surrounding catheter-related thrombosis remain controversial. Thirteen years ago, the Italian Study Group for Long Term Central Venous Access (GAVeCeLT) developed a nationwide Consensus in order to clarify some key aspects on this topic. Despite most of them still remain valid, however, knowledge around catheter-related thrombosis has greatly evolved over the last decade, with a natural evolution in terms of catheter technologies, insertion techniques, and management bundles. Aims of this editorial are to readdress conclusions of the 2007 GAVeCeLT Consensus in the light of the new relevant evidences that have been added in the last 13 years and to analyze some unsolved issues that still remain debated.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 583-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-yuan Zheng ◽  
Hui Xue ◽  
Hua Yuan ◽  
Shu-xiang Liu ◽  
Xiu-ying Zhang

At present, central venous access devices (CVADs) are widely used in clinical practice. The reasons for CVAD obstruction caused by precipitated medication or lipids are increasingly complex. However, there is no clear treatment program for CVAD obstruction caused by precipitated medication or lipids. The target of this study was to analyze data regarding obstruction caused by precipitated medication or lipids in CVADs and to calculate the efficacy of different treatment methods. A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted in alignment with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. The PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and China National Knowledge Internet databases were searched for original research published before 2018. There were 1356 publications initially screened, with one additional study identified through snowballing. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The reasons for obstruction, except for clot formation, primarily included the following: mechanical complications; lipid deposition; mineral deposition; or drug precipitation. Meta-analysis showed that sodium hydroxide resulted in the highest recanalization rate in lipid deposition, followed by ethanol, and the difference was significant. The efficacy analysis revealed that hydrochloric acid and l-cysteine have similar effects on mineral deposition and drug precipitation. According to this review, the most effective methodology was shown to be the intravenous perfusion of sodium hydroxide in several treatments when the obstruction is caused by lipid deposition. In contrast, mineral deposition and drug deposition are best treated with l-cysteine to recover the patency of central venous access devices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document