scholarly journals The Impact of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms on Vascular Surgery Training in Open Aneurysm Repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. e158-e159
Author(s):  
Nadin Elsayed ◽  
Maryam A. Khan ◽  
Isaac Naazie ◽  
Jaideep Das Gupta ◽  
Randall De Martino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Surgery ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Surgery Training ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Endovascular repair of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms by fenestrated and branched endografts†

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 993-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Gallitto ◽  
Gianluca Faggioli ◽  
Rodolfo Pini ◽  
Chiara Mascoli ◽  
Stefano Ancetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Abstract OBJECTIVES Our objective was to report the outcomes of fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) with endografts. METHODS Between January 2010 and April 2018, patients with TAAAs, considered at high surgical risk for open surgery and treated by Cook-Zenith fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair, were prospectively enrolled and retrospectively analysed. The early end points were 30-day/hospital mortality rate, spinal cord ischaemia and 30-day cardiopulmonary and nephrological morbidity. Follow-up end points were survival, patency of target visceral vessels and freedom from reinterventions. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients (male: 77%; mean age: 73 ± 7 years; American Society of Anesthesiologists 3/4: 58/42%) were enrolled. Using Crawford’s classification, 43 (49%) were types I–III and 45 (51%) were type IV TAAAs. The mean aneurysm diameter was 65 ± 15 mm. Custom-made and off-the-shelf endografts were used in 60 (68%) and 28 (32%) cases, respectively. Five (6%) patients had a contained ruptured TAAA. The procedure was performed in multiple steps in 42 (48%) cases. There was 1 (1%) intraoperative death. Five (6%) patients suffered spinal cord ischaemia with permanent paraplegia in 3 (3%) cases. Postoperative cardiac and pulmonary complications occurred in 7 (8%) and 12 (14%) patients, respectively. Worsening of renal function (≥30% of baseline level) was detected in 11 (13%) cases, and 2 (2%) patients required haemodialysis. The 30-day and hospital mortality rates were 5% and 8%, respectively. The mean follow-up was 36 ± 22 months. Survival at 12, 24 and 36 months was 89%, 75% and 70%, respectively. The patency of target visceral vessels at 12, 24 and 36 months was 92%, 92% and 92%, respectively. Freedom from reinterventions at 12, 24 and 36 months was 85%, 85% and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The endovascular repair of TAAAs with fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair is feasible and effective with acceptable technical/clinical outcomes at early/midterm follow-up.

Endovascular Repair of Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Hinchliffe ◽  
Jan A. Macierewicz ◽  
Brian R. Hopkinson
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Serial Ct ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
The Impact

Purpose: To report a single-center experience with endovascular repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm (IAAA), with particular attention to the fate of the aneurysm sac, perianeurysmal fibrosis (PAF), and renal function. Methods: A retrospective review of 350 patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair during a 7-year period at University Hospital, Nottingham, identified 14 (4%) cases of IAAA confirmed either on preoperative spiral computed tomography (CT) or at laparotomy in attempted open aneurysm repair. All data were reviewed from a prospectively maintained database, hospital notes, and serial CT studies. Results: Endovascular repair was successfully completed in all 14 IAAA patients, but 2 (14%) died in the perioperative period. One patient referred from another center was lost to imaging follow-up, leaving 11 patients who were followed for a mean 29 months (range 1–73). All 11 IAAAs remained excluded, but 1 patient required a secondary transabdominal intervention for a type III endoleak. There was no CT evidence of PAF progression in any patient. Postoperative renal complications were not encountered where there had been none preoperatively. Conclusions: IAAA may be successfully excluded by the endovascular technique, and EVAR is particularly useful where open repair has failed. The impact of endograft placement on perianeurysmal fibrosis is less clear. In this study, there was no suggestion that the degree of PAF worsens following endovascular repair.

Long-term outcomes and factors influencing late survival following elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A 24-year experience

Vascular ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manar Khashram ◽  
Julie S Jenkins ◽  
Jason Jenkins ◽  
Allan J Kruger ◽  
Nicholas S Boyne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Background Abdominal aortic aneurysms can be either treated by an open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair or an endovascular repair. Comparing clinical predictors of outcomes and those which influence survival rates in the long term is important in determining the choice of treatment offered and the decision-making process with patients. Aims To determine the influence of pre-existing clinical predictors and perioperative determinants on late survival of elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and endovascular repair at a tertiary hospital. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair from 1990 to 2013 were included. Data were collected from a prospectively acquired database and death data were gathered from the Queensland state death registry. Pre-existing risks and perioperative factors were assessed independently. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression modeling were performed. Results During the study period, 1340 abdominal aortic aneurysms were repaired electively, of which 982 were open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The average age was 72.4 years old and 81.7% were males. The cumulative percentage survival rates for open abdominal aortic aneurysms repair at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years were 79, 49, 31 and 22, respectively. The corresponding 5-, 10- and 15-year survival rates for endovascular repair were not significantly different at 75, 49 and 33%, respectively (P = 0.75). Predictors of reduced survival were advanced age, American Society of Anaesthesiology scores, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal impairment, bifurcated grafts, peripheral vascular disease and congestive heart failure. Conclusions Open repair offers a good long-term treatment option for patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm and in our experience there is no significant difference in late survival between open abdominal aortic aneurysms repair and endovascular repair. Consideration of the factors identified in this study that predict reduced long-term survival for open abdominal aortic aneurysms repair and endovascular repair should be considered when deciding repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document