Understanding Opioid Prescribing Practices of Resident Physicians

Background To compare opioid prescribing practices of resident physicians across a variety of surgical and nonsurgical specialties; to identify factors which influence prescribing practices; and to examine resident utilization of best practice supplemental resources. Methods An anonymous survey which assessed prescribing practices was completed by residents from one of several different subspecialties, including internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and urology. Fisher’s exact test assessed differences in prescribing practices between specialties. Results Only 35% of residents reported receiving formal training in safe opioid prescribing. Overall, the most frequently reported influences on prescribing practices were the use of standardized order sets for specific procedures, attending preference, and patient’s history of prescribed opioids. Resident physicians significantly underutilize best practice supplemental resources, such as counseling patients on pain expectations prior to prescribing opioid medication; contacting established pain specialists; screening patients for opioid abuse; referring to the Prescription Monitoring Program; and counseling patients on safe disposal of unused pills ( P < .001). Discussion The incorporation of comprehensive prescribing education into resident training and the utilization of standardized order sets can promote safe opioid prescribing.

Does empathy really decline during residency training? A longitudinal look at changes in measured empathy in a community program

Introduction Some studies, most cross sectional and urban, have shown a decline in empathy during residency training prompting medical educators to consider changes in curriculum or training environment. Our aim was to determine if there was a decline using a longitudinal, paired annual empathy measure across three years of a family medicine residency in a rural community hospital. Methods We administered a validated measure from 2015 through 2020 and of the 116 opportunities for survey completion, 112 from 48 residents were available for scoring. We also asked our residents to rank 10 factors that affected their empathy scores. The Baptist Health Madisonville IRB approved the protocol as exempt and the authors have no conflicts of interest.. Results With a response rate of 97%, we found no statistically significant decrease in our resident scores across the three years. Scores after our PG-1 year were significantly lower than two previous comparable studies. The longitudinal, paired study design revealed very wide ranges among individual residents even when group means indicated a statistical difference. Residents also differed widely on their rankings of factors that could affect the score, with only outlook on life showing a narrow range and high ranking. Conclusions The very wide range of individual paired scores as well as the broad range of factors the residents thought affected their scores indicate that empathy is a very individual concept. Some of our residents actually increased scores leading to resilience and others declined toward cynicism. Those seeking to make changes to curriculum or training environment to facilitate empathy during residency should consider this diversity of individual resident training experience.

The Importance of the Institution of a Robotic Curriculum on Resident Training and Performance

In 2018, general surgery topped the number of robotic cases. Over 90% of residents participate, but only 65% of programs have a formal curriculum, and less than half track progress. Many are insufficient at training due to an observational role. This paper reviews Marshall University General Surgery Residency program’s robotic curriculum, which started in 2018. The curriculum consists of a weekend course and simulations, enabling residents obtain certification. Residents participated in Intuitive’s Resident Robotic Olympics with first place in 2019 and second and third place in 2020. For the 2021 year, the robotic curriculum was revised into phases based on year. Deadlines and forms help improve and track progress. It is important to develop a curriculum with a protocol for training, monitoring, and credentialing to ensure proficiency. Marshall University General Surgery robotic curriculum has been successful at improving robotic skill, enabling residents to obtain a robotic surgery certification upon graduation.

Action Planning Checklist for Social Determinants of Health: Older Adults with Chronic Conditions

Medical residents need training to assess social determinants of health (SDOH) related to chronic conditions. We created a checklist to identify SDOH affecting residency clinic patients’ ability to manage chronic conditions. The tool: 1) involves resident training; 2) provides decision support checklist; 3) influences patient activation; and 4) increases provider and patient communication through shared decision making. Action Planning Guide checklist (APG) includes questions pertaining to SDOH preventing patients from managing their chronic conditions and actions patients will take. Areas identified are discussed between patient and resident, increasing patient activation. The clinic’s nurse care facilitator guides referrals to community-based resources. Fifty-two patients were enrolled, with 75% of patients responding they would like to be better managers of their chronic conditions. This information is used to develop patient’s goals of care. Over 90% of patients said their conditions affect their lives and discussed ways better to care for themselves. Over 80% discussed medication management, health goals to improve their quality of life, and made a plan that maps out ways to reach their goals. All of these are essential for achieving positive health outcomes for older patients with chronic conditions. These attributes promote effective patient/provider partnerships. Seventy referrals were made; food through 2-1-1 (47%); monthly commodity food program (30%); utility payments (11%), and transportation (9%). Twenty-seven referrals were made to agencies serving older adults; 25 to the local AAA information and assistance services, and 2 to Senior Project Fresh Voucher Program.

An Assessment of Pediatric Resident Disaster Preparedness for the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Objective: To assess the level of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) disaster preparedness among pediatric residents. Methods: A mixed-methods study including qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys was used. Interviews guided survey development. Surveys were distributed to residents who rotated through Children’s National NICU. Questions assessed residents’ background in disaster preparedness, disaster protocol knowledge, NICU preparedness, roles during surge and evacuation, and views on training and education. Results: Survey response was 62.5% (n = 80) with 51.3% of invited residents completing it. Pediatric residents (PGY-2 and PGY-3) (n = 41) had low levels of individual disaster preparedness, particularly evacuations (86%). None were aware of specific NICU disaster protocols. Patient acuity, role ambiguity, knowledge, and training deficits were major contributors to unpreparedness. Residents viewed their role as system facilitators (eg, performing duties assigned, recruiting other residents, and clerical work like documentation). Resident training requests included disaster preparedness training every NICU rotation (48%) using multidisciplinary simulations (66%), role definition (56%), and written protocols (50%). Despite their unpreparedness, residents (84%) were willing to respond. Conclusion: Pediatric residents lacked knowledge of NICU disaster response but were willing to respond to disasters. Training should include multi-disciplinary simulations that can be refined iteratively to clarify roles, and residents should be involved in planning and execution.

Burnout in French General Practitioners: A Nationwide Prospective Study

Background: We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of burnout among French general practitioners in private practice and to study the risk and protective factors of burnout. Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted with French GPs working in a private practice in France who were asked to fulfil an internet questionnaire. We used the secure internet application REDCap®. Exclusion criteria were only working in a hospital, substitute doctors, and internship students. There was a putative sample size of 88,886 GPs. We retrieved the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), occupational characteristics (type of installation, emergency regulated shifts, night shifts, university supervisor, weekly hours worked, seniority), and personal characteristics such as age, gender, marital status, and number of children. Results: We included 1926 GPs among the 2602 retrieved questionnaires. A total of 44.8% of French liberal GPs were experiencing burnout, with 4.8% (95%CI 3.9–5.9%) experiencing severe burnout. The risk factors of severe burnout were male gender (RR = 1.91, 95%CI 1.15–3.16), working in a suburban area (5.23, 2.18–12.58), and having more than 28 appointments per day (1.95, 1.19–3.19). Working more than 50 h weekly showed a tendency to increase the risk of severe burnout (1.55, 0.93–2.59, p = 0.095), with a significant increase in the risk of low and moderate burnout (1.31, 1.02–1.67 and 1.86, 1.34–2.57, respectively). Protective factors were mainly resident training, which decreased the risk of both low, moderate, and severe burnout (0.65, 0.51–0.83; 0.66, 0.48–0.92; and 0.42, 95%CI 0.23–0.76, respectively). Performing home visits decreased the risk of severe burnout (0.25, 0.13–0.47), as did group practice for intermediate level of burnout (0.71, 0.51–0.96). Conclusion: GPs are at a high risk of burnout, with nearly half of them in burnout, with burnout predominantly affecting males and those between the ages of 50 and 60 years old. The main risk factors were a high workload with more than 28 appointments per day or 50 h of work per week, and the main protective factors were related to social cohesion such having a teaching role and working in a group practice with back-office support.

Assessing the quality of electronic medical records as a platform for resident education

Background Previous studies have assessed note quality and the use of electronic medical record (EMR) as a part of medical training. However, a generalized and user-friendly note quality assessment tool is required for quick clinical assessment. We held a medical record writing competition and developed a checklist for assessing the note quality of participants’ medical records. Using the checklist, this study aims to explore note quality between residents of different specialties and offer pedagogical implications. Methods The authors created an inpatient checklist that examined fundamental EMR requirements through six note types and twenty items. A total of 149 records created by residents from 32 departments/stations were randomly selected. Seven senior physicians rated the EMRs using a checklist. Medical records were grouped as general medicine, surgery, paediatric, obstetrics and gynaecology, and other departments. The overall and group performances were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results Overall performance was rated as fair to good. Regarding the six note types, discharge notes (0.81) gained the highest scores, followed by admission notes (0.79), problem list (0.73), overall performance (0.73), progress notes (0.71), and weekly summaries (0.66). Among the five groups, other departments (80.20) had the highest total score, followed by obstetrics and gynaecology (78.02), paediatrics (77.47), general medicine (75.58), and surgery (73.92). Conclusions This study suggested that duplication in medical notes and the documentation abilities of residents affect the quality of medical records in different departments. Further research is required to apply the insights obtained in this study to improve the quality of notes and, thereby, the effectiveness of resident training.