scholarly journals Corrigendum to “Defining risk groups of patients with cancer of unknown primary site and cervical nodal metastases by F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging” [Kaohsiung J Med Sci 32 (08) (2016) 407–413]

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 597
Author(s):  
Yung-Yueh Su ◽  
Shih-Hsin Chen ◽  
Chia-Hsun Hsieh ◽  
Chun-Ta Liao ◽  
Chien-Yu Lin ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2076-2076
Author(s):  
Emilie Le Rhun ◽  
Michael Weller ◽  
Anna Sophie Berghoff ◽  
Elisabeth Jane Rushing ◽  
Lisa Fuereder ◽  
...  

2076 Background: Brain metastasis (BM) are the first clinical presentation of cancer in around 30% of patients. They are then referred as BM from cancer of unknown primary site (BM-CUPS). The value of 18F-fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/CT has not yet be determined for the management of these patients. Methods: A total of 566 patients were operated for BM at the University Hospital Zurich between 2004 and 2014, of whom 127 were identified as BM-CUPS patients. Two cohorts from other independent centers (n = 100 and 120) were used for the validation of data. Results: No difference in determining the localization of the primary lesion was observed between FDG-PET/CT and CT (FDG-PET/CT: 73/78, 93.6%; CT: n = 70/78, 89.7%; p = 0.25, McNemar’s test). The same pattern of primary lesion and other extracranial lesions was observed in 36 of 64 patients (56.3%). Additional suspicious extracranial metastases were identified by FDG-PET/CT in 28 patients (43.7%). The median graded prognostic assessment (GPA) scores were 2.5 determined according to FDG-PET/CT and 3 according to CT alone (p = 3.8x10-5), resulting in predicted survival times of 3.8 versus 5.3 months (p = 6.1x10-5; Wilcoxon’s test). Conclusions: A similar sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT and chest CT was observed for the detection of the primary tumor in BM-CUPS, however, FDG-PET/CT significantly improved the accuracy of staging. FDG-PET/CT should be preferred for the management of BM-CUPS and may help to avoid redundant CT imaging.


Dermatology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 217 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick A. Oberholzer ◽  
Mirjana Urosevic ◽  
Hans C. Steinert ◽  
Reinhard Dummer

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20696-e20696
Author(s):  
Benjamin Scheier ◽  
Alexander T. Pearson ◽  
Joshua Murray Wilfong ◽  
Laurence H. Baker

Cancer ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 292-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Sève ◽  
Claire Billotey ◽  
Christiane Broussolle ◽  
Charles Dumontet ◽  
John R. Mackey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document