Nationwide Survey on Family-perceived Experiences of Patients With Cancer of Unknown Primary Site

Purpose: Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. As research on the experiences of CUP patients and their families is scarce, this study aimed to compare the family-perceived burden of CUP with that of common cancers (lung, colon, and stomach cancer). Additional aims were to explore the association between family-perceived burden and CUP patients’ quality of life (QOL) at end-of-life and family depression.Methods: This was a pre-planned secondary analysis of nationwide cross-sectional survey data from the bereaved family members of patients with cancer who died at 286 institutions. The major measurements were the eight-item family-perceived Burden scale (comprising specialist access, uncertainty, and prolonged diagnosis), Good Death Inventory, and Patient Health Questionnaire 9.Results: Of the total 27,591 survey responses, we analyzed 97 and 717 responses from the family members of patients with CUP and common cancer, respectively. The families of CUP patients scored significantly higher on all three burden subscales than those of common cancer patients (effect sizes: specialist access subscale, 0.3; uncertainty subscale, 0.66; and prolonged diagnosis subscale, 0.69; adjusted P < 0.01). Greater family Burden was significantly associated with lower patient QOL and higher family depression. Burden was significantly associated with being a spouse, second opinion consultation, and diagnosis period of >1 month.Conclusion: The families of CUP patients experience poor specialist access, greater uncertainty, and a prolonged diagnosis. They should be cared for from the initial stages to establish access to specialists, obtain an early diagnosis, and reduce uncertainty.

THE ROLE OF DIAGNOSTIC OESOPHAGO-GASTRODUODENOSCOPY (OGD) AND COLONOSCOPY IN CANCER OF UNKNOWN PRIMARY

Objective: To study the role of gastrointestinal procedures, namely oesophago-gastroduodenoscopy (OGD) and colonoscopy, in helping to establish a definitive primary tumour site in cancer of unknown primary. Study Design: Prospective observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore Pakistan, from Jan 2018 to Jan 2019. Methodology: A total of 115 patients included in the study were those, who underwent OGD and a colonoscopy for the diagnosis of a cancer of unknown primary. Data collected included demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, definitive diagnosis, tissue diagnosis and immune-histochemical stains. Primary outcome was the attainment of a definitive diagnosis via OGD and/or colonoscopy. Results: A total of 115 patients underwent a diagnostic gastrointestinal procedure. Of these 70 (61%) were males. Mean age was 63 ± 12.6 years (range 22-88 years). Abdominal pain comprised the most common presenting complaint, found in 61 (53%). The most common tissue diagnosis of the metastatic sites was adenocarcinoma 81 (70.45%). Tumour markers including carcinoembryonic antigen, alpha-fetoprotein and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were checked in 90 (78.2%), 46 (40%) and 69 (60%) patients respectively. No patient reached a definitive diagnosis by means of OGD and/or colonoscopy. Conclusion: OGD and colonoscopy when done collectively as diagnostic procedures to look for a primary tumour, have no value in the evaluation of patients with cancer of unknown primary.

Real-world data analysis of patients with cancer of unknown primary

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous malignancy in which the primary site of the tumor cannot be identified through standard work-up. The survival outcome of CUP is generally poor, and there is no consensus for treatment. Here, we comprehensively analyzed the real-world data of 218 patients with CUP (median age, 62 years [range, 19–91]; male, 62.3%). Next-generation sequencing was conducted in 22 (10%) patients, one of whom showed level 1 genetic alteration. Most (60.3%) patients were treated with empirical cytotoxic chemotherapy, and two patients received targeted therapy based on the NGS results. The median OS was 8.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.2–11.4), and the median progression-free survival of patients treated with chemotherapy was 4.4 months (95% CI 3.4–5.3). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 or 1 and localized disease were significantly associated with favorable survival outcomes. Collectively, we found that CUP patients had a poor prognosis after standard treatment, and those with localized disease who received local treatment and those with better PS treated with multiple lines of chemotherapy had better survival outcomes. Targeted therapies based on NGS results are expected to improve survival outcomes.

Cancer of unknown primary origin presented with rapid deterioration without significant symptoms, a case report

A 34-year-old woman with flank pain was referred for suspicious lymphadenopathy. PET/CT scan revealed disseminated lesions without apparent primary origin. Although she did not complain of any symptoms, after rapid deterioration, she died of respiratory distress and cardiac arrest. Her strong beliefs contribute to symptoms tolerance and late diagnosis.

Case Report: Tissue Origin Identification for Cancer of Unknown Primary: Gene Expression Profiling Approach

The treatment of cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a huge challenge for clinicians. Gene expression profiling can help identify the tissue origin of tumors by detecting the expression levels of specific genes in tumor tissues. Herein, we report four CUP cases. All of them have been successfully identified with the corresponding primary tumor sites through gene expression profiling analysis. Then all patients received accurate treatment, providing reference to guide therapeutic decisions to treat CUP tumors in the future.