Instrumented gait analysis in patients with medial osteoarthritis of the knee after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

The Knee ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 392-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.B. Seeger ◽  
J.P. Schikschneit ◽  
C. Schuld ◽  
R. Rupp ◽  
M. Rickert ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyuck Min Kwon ◽  
Jin-Ah Lee ◽  
Yong-Gon Koh ◽  
Kwan Kyu Park ◽  
Kyoung-Tak Kang

Abstract Background Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective treatment for end-stage, symptomatic unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee joint. However, patellofemoral joint degeneration is a contraindication to medial UKA. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effect of medial UKA using fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) design prostheses on the patellofemoral joint. Methods A three-dimensional finite-element model of a normal knee joint was developed using medical image data. We performed statistical analysis for each model. The differences in contact stress on the patellofemoral joint and the quadriceps force between the FB and MB designs were evaluated under a deep-knee-bend condition.Results At an early flexion angle, the results of contact stress showed no significant difference between the FB and MB medial UKA models and the intact model. However, at large flexion angles, we observed a significant increase in contact stress with the FB models. On the contrary, in the case of the MB models, we found no statistically significant increment compared with the intact model. Our results indicate that with medial UKA, the contact stress increased and greater quadriceps force was applied to the patellofemoral joint. However, performing UKA on a patellofemoral joint with osteoarthritis should not be difficult, unless anterior knee pain is present, because the increase in contact stress is negligible. Conclusions Our results show no significant difference in contact stress on the patellofemoral joint between the medial UKA and intact knee joint models. Such a mechanism was easily found in MB medial UKA. Therefore, this study biomechanically showed that degenerative changes in the patellofemoral joint should not be considered an absolute contraindication to treatment with medial UKA.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyuck Min Kwon ◽  
Jin-Ah Lee ◽  
Yong-Gon Koh ◽  
Kwan Kyu Park ◽  
Kyoung-Tak Kang

Abstract Background Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective treatment for end-stage, symptomatic unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee joint. However, patellofemoral joint degeneration is a contraindication to medial UKA. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effect of medial UKA using fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) design prostheses on the patellofemoral joint.Methods A three-dimensional finite-element model of a normal knee joint was developed using medical image data. We performed statistical analysis for each model. The differences in contact stress on the patellofemoral joint and the quadriceps force between the FB and MB designs were evaluated under a deep-knee-bend condition.Results At an early flexion angle, the results of contact stress showed no significant difference between the FB and MB medial UKA models and the intact model. However, at large flexion angles, we observed a significant increase in contact stress with the FB models. On the contrary, in the case of the MB models, we found no statistically significant increment compared with the intact model. Our results indicate that with medial UKA, the contact stress increased and greater quadriceps force was applied to the patellofemoral joint. However, performing UKA on a patellofemoral joint with osteoarthritis should not be difficult, unless anterior knee pain is present, because the increase in contact stress is negligible.Conclusions Our results show no significant difference in contact stress on the patellofemoral joint between the medial UKA and intact knee joint models. Such a mechanism was easily found in MB medial UKA. Therefore, this study biomechanically showed that degenerative changes in the patellofemoral joint should not be considered an absolute contraindication to treatment with medial UKA.


Author(s):  
D. M. Moore ◽  
G. A. Sheridan ◽  
A. Welch-Phillips ◽  
J. M. O’Byrne ◽  
P. Kenny

Abstract Purpose Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) provides patients with an alternative treatment to TKA in isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis providing better functional outcomes and faster recovery in the short term. Our aim was to quantify revision rates, predictors of revision, mortality rate and functionality of the Oxford Phase 3 UKA in a non-designer institution. Methods This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected regional registry data. All Oxford Phase 3 UKAs performed for medial tibio-femoral osteoarthritis of the knee joint were included from a single academic institution between the period of January 1st 2006 and December 30th 2009. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves adjusting for loss to follow-up and deceased patients were generated. Primary outcome variables included all-cause and aseptic revision. Secondary outcome variables included functional outcome scores. Patients were reviewed at 6 months, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years and 15 years. Results A total of 64 cemented Oxford phase 3 UKAs were performed between January 2006 and November 2009. Fifteen-year follow-up data were available for 51 patients, of these 12 required revision. Survival rates, adjusting for patients that were either lost to follow-up or deceased, were 87.5% at 5 years, 81.4% at 10 years and 76.4% at 15 years. The overall aseptic revision rate at the time of review was 18.75% (n = 12). The only significant predictor of postoperative WOMAC score at 15 years was the preoperative WOMAC score (p = 0.03). Conclusion The Oxford Phase 3 UKA for medial tibio-femoral arthritis has promising outcomes at 15-year follow-up with a survival rate of 76.4% in a non-designer centre. Level of Evidence III.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document