Fe-Ni Invar alloys: A review

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 2242-2244
Author(s):  
A. Sahoo ◽  
V.R.R. Medicherla
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 863 ◽  
pp. 158605
Author(s):  
S.S. Acharya ◽  
V.R.R. Medicherla ◽  
Komal Bapna ◽  
Khadiza Ali ◽  
Deepnarayan Biswas ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 3318-3324 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Mohn ◽  
K. Schwarz ◽  
D. Wagner
Keyword(s):  

1979 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. K147-K151 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Török ◽  
G. Hausch
Keyword(s):  

Materia Japan ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1080-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michio Kishida ◽  
Tsuyoshi Masumoto
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1027-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Simon ◽  
O. Lyon

A large rapidly decreasing intensity called the `scattering tail' is generally observed at the smallest recorded angles during small-angle measurements of metallic alloys. Since this tail was interpreted as caused by a bimodal phase separation in Cu–Ni–Fe alloys and by long-wavelength concentration fluctuations in Invar alloys, these two systems were re-examined with anomalous X-ray scattering. The variation of the alloying atomic contrasts allows a discrimination between the different types of particles or defects. In neither of the two systems can the tails be interpreted as caused by large-scale concentration fluctuations. In Cu–Ni–Fe alloys, the tail is due to some kind of superficial defect (surface roughness etc.). In Invar alloys, the tail is probably due to residual impurity particles.


1992 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-91
Author(s):  
V. A. Vershinin ◽  
I. V. Nel'zina ◽  
S. L. Epifanova ◽  
Z. V. Kuznetsova

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document