scholarly journals Orbitofrontal Cortex as a Cognitive Map of Task Space

Neuron ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Wilson ◽  
Yuji K. Takahashi ◽  
Geoffrey Schoenbaum ◽  
Yael Niv
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Bradfield ◽  
Genevra Hart

The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) has recently been proposed to function as a cognitive map oftask space: a mental model of the various steps involved in a task. This idea has proven popularbecause it provides a cohesive explanation for a number of disparate findings regarding the OFC’srole in a broad array of tasks. Concurrently, mounting evidence has begun to reveal the functional heterogeneity of OFC subregions, particularly the medial and lateral OFC. How these subregions might uniquely contribute to the OFC’s role as a cognitive map of task space, however, has not been explored. Here we propose that the lateral OFC represents the agent’s initial position within that task map (i.e. initial state), determining which actions are available as a consequence of that position, whereas the medial OFC represents the agent’s desired future position within the task map(i.e. terminal state), influencing which actions are selected to achieve that position. We argue thatthese processes are achieved somewhat independently and somewhat interdependently, and are achieved through similar but non-identical circuitry.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew P H Gardner ◽  
Geoffrey Schoenbaum

Theories of orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) function have evolved substantially over the last few decades. There is now a general consensus that the OFC is important for predicting aspects of future events and for using these predictions to guide behavior. Yet the precise content of these predictions and the degree to which OFC contributes to agency contingent upon them has become contentious, with several plausible theories advocating different answers to these questions. In this review we will focus on three of these ideas - the economic value, credit assignment, and cognitive map hypotheses – describing both their successes and failures. We will propose that these failures hint at a more nuanced role for the OFC in supporting the proposed functions when an underlying model or map of the causal structures in the environment must be constructed or updated.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e1005925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhewei Zhang ◽  
Zhenbo Cheng ◽  
Zhongqiao Lin ◽  
Chechang Nie ◽  
Tianming Yang

Neuron ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 1402-1412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas W. Schuck ◽  
Ming Bo Cai ◽  
Robert C. Wilson ◽  
Yael Niv

2001 ◽  
Vol 209 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Kleinsorge ◽  
Herbert Heuer ◽  
Volker Schmidtke

Summary. When participants have to shift between four tasks that result from a factorial combination of the task dimensions judgment (numerical vs. spatial) and mapping (compatible vs. incompatible), a characteristic profile of shift costs can be observed that is suggestive of a hierarchical switching mechanism that operates upon a dimensionally ordered task representation, with judgment on the top and the response on the bottom of the task hierarchy ( Kleinsorge & Heuer, 1999 ). This switching mechanism results in unintentional shifts on lower levels of the task hierarchy whenever a shift on a higher level has to be performed, leading to non-shift costs on the lower levels. We investigated whether this profile depends on the way in which the individual task dimensions are cued. When the cues for the task dimensions were exchanged, the basic pattern of shift costs was replicated with only minor modifications. This indicates that the postulated hierarchical switching mechanism operates independently of the specifics of task cueing.


2008 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 174-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas C. Pritchard ◽  
Erin N. Nedderman ◽  
Erin M. Edwards ◽  
Andrew C. Petticoffer ◽  
Gary J. Schwartz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alliston K. Reid ◽  
John E. R. Staddon
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document