Manipulations of attention dissociate fragile visual short-term memory from visual working memory

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1559-1568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annelinde R.E. Vandenbroucke ◽  
Ilja G. Sligte ◽  
Victor A.F. Lamme
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Logie ◽  
Mario Parra ◽  
Stephen Rhodes ◽  
Elaine Niven ◽  
Richard Allen ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonino Raffone ◽  
Gezinus Wolters ◽  
Jacob M. Murre

We suggest a neurophysiological account of the short-term memory capacity limit based on a model of visual working memory (Raffone & Wolters, in press). Simulations have revealed a critical capacity limit of about four independent patterns. The model mechanisms may be applicable to working memory in general and they allow a reinterpretation of some of the issues discussed by Cowan.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tal Yatziv ◽  
Yoav Kessler

Over the last couple of decades, a vast amount of research has been dedicated to understanding the nature and the architecture of visual short-term memory (VSTM), the mechanism by which currently relevant visual information is maintained. According to discrete-capacity models, VSTM is constrained by a limited number of discrete representations held simultaneously. In contrast, shared-resource models regard VSTM as limited in resources, which can be distributed flexibly between varying numbers of representations, and a new interference model posits that capacity is limited by interference among items. In this paper, we begin by reviewing benchmark findings regarding the debate over VSTM limitations, focusing on whether VSTM storage is all-or-none, and on whether objects’ complexity affects capacity. Afterwards, we put forward a hybrid framework of VSTM architecture, arguing that this system is composed of a two-level hierarchy of memory stores, each containing a different set of representations: (1) Perceptual Memory (PM), a resource-like level containing analog automatically-formed representations of visual stimuli in varying degrees of activation, and (2) visual Working Memory (WM), in which a subset of 3-4 items from PM are bound to conceptual representations and to their locations, thus conveying discrete (digital/symbolic) information which appears quantized. While PM has a large capacity and is relatively non-selective, visual WM is restricted in the number of items that can be maintained simultaneously and its content is regulated by a gating mechanism.


2002 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 753-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackie Andrade ◽  
Eva Kemps ◽  
Yves Werniers ◽  
Jon May ◽  
Arnaud Szmalec

Several authors have hypothesized that visuo-spatial working memory is functionally analogous to verbal working memory. Irrelevant background speech impairs verbal short-term memory. We investigated whether irrelevant visual information has an analogous effect on visual short-term memory, using a dynamic visual noise (DVN) technique known to disrupt visual imagery (Quinn & McConnell, 1996b). Experiment 1 replicated the effect of DVN on pegword imagery. Experiments 2 and 3 showed no effect of DVN on recall of static matrix patterns, despite a significant effect of a concurrent spatial tapping task. Experiment 4 showed no effect of DVN on encoding or maintenance of arrays of matrix patterns, despite testing memory by a recognition procedure to encourage visual rather than spatial processing. Serial position curves showed a one-item recency effect typical of visual short-term memory. Experiment 5 showed no effect of DVN on short-term recognition of Chinese characters, despite effects of visual similarity and a concurrent colour memory task that confirmed visual processing of the characters. We conclude that irrelevant visual noise does not impair visual short-term memory. Visual working memory may not be functionally analogous to verbal working memory, and different cognitive processes may underlie visual short-term memory and visual imagery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document