scholarly journals Understanding the role of the primary somatosensory cortex: Opportunities for rehabilitation

2015 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 246-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.R. Borich ◽  
S.M. Brodie ◽  
W.A. Gray ◽  
S. Ionta ◽  
L.A. Boyd
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Schaefer ◽  
Anja Kühnel ◽  
Franziska Rumpel ◽  
Matti Gärtner

AbstractPrevious research revealed an active network of brain areas such as insula and anterior cingulate cortex when witnessing somebody else in pain and feeling empathy. But numerous studies also suggested a role of the somatosensory cortices for state and trait empathy. While recent studies highlight the role of the observer’s primary somatosensory cortex when seeing painful or nonpainful touch, the interaction of somatosensory cortex activity with empathy when receiving touch on the own body is unknown. The current study examines the relationship of touch related somatosensory cortex activity with dispositional empathy by employing an fMRI approach. Participants were touched on the palm of the hand either by the hand of an experimenter or by a rubber hand. We found that the BOLD responses in the primary somatosensory cortex were associated with empathy personality traits personal distress and perspective taking. This relationship was observed when participants were touched both with the experimenter’s real hand or a rubber hand. What is the reason for this link between touch perception and trait empathy? We argue that more empathic individuals may express stronger attention both to other’s human perceptions as well as to the own sensations. In this way, higher dispositional empathy levels might enhance tactile processing by top-down processes. We discuss possible implications of these findings.


1996 ◽  
pp. 329-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Elaine Chapman ◽  
François Tremblay ◽  
Stacey A. Ageranioti-Bélanger

Author(s):  
Matthew James Buchan ◽  
Gemma Gothard ◽  
Alexander von Klemperer ◽  
Joram J van Rheede

The posteromedial thalamus (POm) has extensive recurrent connectivity with the whisker-related primary somatosensory cortex (wS1) of rodents. However, its functional contribution to somatosensory processing in wS1 remains unclear. This article reviews several recent findings which begin to elucidate the role of POm in sensory evoked plasticity and discusses their implications for somatosensory processing.


2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 268-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guglielmo Foffani ◽  
John K. Chapin ◽  
Karen A. Moxon

Computational studies are challenging the intuitive view that neurons with broad tuning curves are necessarily less discriminative than neurons with sharp tuning curves. In the context of somatosensory processing, broad tuning curves are equivalent to large receptive fields. To clarify the computational role of large receptive fields for cortical processing of somatosensory information, we recorded ensembles of single neurons from the infragranular forelimb/forepaw region of the rat primary somatosensory cortex while tactile stimuli were separately delivered to different locations on the forelimbs/forepaws under light anesthesia. We specifically adopted the perspective of individual columns/segregates receiving inputs from multiple body location. Using single-trial analyses of many single-neuron responses, we obtained two main results. 1) The responses of even small populations of neurons recorded from within the same estimated column/segregate can be used to discriminate between stimuli delivered to different surround locations in the excitatory receptive fields. 2) The temporal precision of surround responses is sufficiently high for spike timing to add information over spike count in the discrimination between surround locations. This surround spike-timing code (i) is particularly informative when spike count is ambiguous, e.g., in the discrimination between close locations or when receptive fields are large, (ii) becomes progressively more informative as the number of neurons increases, (iii) is a first-spike code, and (iv) is not limited by the assumption that the time of stimulus onset is known. These results suggest that even though large receptive fields result in a loss of spatial selectivity of single neurons, they can provide as a counterpart a sophisticated temporal code based on latency differences in large populations of neurons without necessarily sacrificing basic information about stimulus location.


2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 317-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cédric Lenoir ◽  
Gan Huang ◽  
Yves Vandermeeren ◽  
Samar Marie Hatem ◽  
André Mouraux

The role of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) in vibrotaction is well established. In contrast, its involvement in nociception is still debated. Here we test whether S1 is similarly involved in the processing of nonnociceptive and nociceptive somatosensory input in humans by comparing the aftereffects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) of S1 on the event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by nonnociceptive and nociceptive somatosensory stimuli delivered to the ipsilateral and contralateral hands. Cathodal HD-tDCS significantly affected the responses to nonnociceptive somatosensory stimuli delivered to the contralateral hand: both early-latency ERPs from within S1 (N20 wave elicited by transcutaneous electrical stimulation of median nerve) and late-latency ERPs elicited outside S1 (N120 wave elicited by short-lasting mechanical vibrations delivered to index fingertip, thought to originate from bilateral operculo-insular and cingulate cortices). These results support the notion that S1 constitutes an obligatory relay for the cortical processing of nonnociceptive tactile input originating from the contralateral hemibody. Contrasting with this asymmetric effect of HD-tDCS on the responses to nonnociceptive somatosensory input, HD-tDCS over the sensorimotor cortex led to a bilateral and symmetric reduction of the magnitude of the N240 wave of nociceptive laser-evoked potentials elicited by stimulation of the hand dorsum. Taken together, our results demonstrate in humans a differential involvement of S1 in vibrotaction and nociception. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Whereas the role of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) in vibrotaction is well established, its involvement in nociception remains strongly debated. By assessing, in healthy volunteers, the effect of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation over S1, we demonstrate a differential involvement of S1 in vibrotaction and nociception.


Author(s):  
R. Romo ◽  
A. Hernández ◽  
V. de Lafuente ◽  
A. Zainos ◽  
L. Lemus ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
R. Romo ◽  
A. Hernández ◽  
V. de Lafuente ◽  
A. Zainos ◽  
L. Lemus ◽  
...  

Pain ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (7) ◽  
pp. 1156-1158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Canavero ◽  
Vincenzo Bonicalzi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document