Unsteady turbulence structure in and downstream of a short elbow at post-critical Reynolds numbers

2020 ◽  
Vol 364 ◽  
pp. 110649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Ikarashi ◽  
T. Yamagata ◽  
F. Yamagishi ◽  
N. Fujisawa
2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 125110 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Lehmkuhl ◽  
I. Rodríguez ◽  
R. Borrell ◽  
J. Chiva ◽  
A. Oliva

2014 ◽  
Vol 761 ◽  
pp. 62-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joris C. G. Verschaeve ◽  
Geir K. Pedersen

AbstractIn the present treatise, the stability of the boundary layer under solitary waves is analysed by means of the parabolized stability equation. We investigate both surface solitary waves and internal solitary waves. The main result is that the stability of the flow is not of parametric nature as has been assumed in the literature so far. Not only does linear stability analysis highlight this misunderstanding, it also gives an explanation why Sumer et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 646, 2010, pp. 207–231), Vittori & Blondeaux (Coastal Engng, vol. 58, 2011, pp. 206–213) and Ozdemir et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 731, 2013, pp. 545–578) each obtained different critical Reynolds numbers in their experiments and simulations. We find that linear instability is possible in the acceleration region of the flow, leading to the question of how this relates to the observation of transition in the acceleration region in the experiments by Sumer et al. or to the conjecture of a nonlinear instability mechanism in this region by Ozdemir et al. The key concept for assessment of instabilities is the integrated amplification which has not been employed for this kind of flow before. In addition, the present analysis is not based on a uniformization of the flow but instead uses a fully nonlinear description including non-parallel effects, weakly or fully. This allows for an analysis of the sensitivity with respect to these effects. Thanks to this thorough analysis, quantitative agreement between model results and direct numerical simulation has been obtained for the problem in question. The use of a high-order accurate Navier–Stokes solver is primordial in order to obtain agreement for the accumulated amplifications of the Tollmien–Schlichting waves as revealed in this analysis. An elaborate discussion on the effects of amplitudes and water depths on the stability of the flow is presented.


1965 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 503-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Gill

It is found that only a small change in either of the undisturbed velocity profiles concerned is required to change them from stable profiles to unstable profiles. The change must be such as to produce a local maximum in the magnitude of the vorticity, or in the case of the pipe, in the magnitude of the vorticity divided by the radius. The actual change in the vorticity (or vorticity/radius) need only be small, but the gradient of the vorticity (or vorticity/radius) must be finite. Viscosity will tend to damp out the distortion in the mean flow that is responsible for the instability, so that if the flow is to become turbulent, non-linear effects must become important before the distortion of the mean flow is reduced to an ineffective level. This requirement leads to the determination of critical Reynolds numbers which depend on the initial (small) distortion of the mean flow and the initial (smaller) amplitude of periodic disturbances. These critical Reynolds numbers are large.


AIAA Journal ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (9) ◽  
pp. 1857-1870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Ju Lin ◽  
Jiun-Jih Miau ◽  
Jung-Kuo Tu ◽  
Hsing-Wen Tsai

Author(s):  
Timothy P. Brackbill ◽  
Satish G. Kandlikar

Nikuradse’s [1] work on friction factors focused on the turbulent flow regime in addition to being performed in large diameter pipes. Laminar data was collected by Nikuradse, however only low relative roughness values were examined. A recent review by Kandlikar [2] showed that the uncertainties in the laminar region of Nikuradse’s experiments were very high, and his conclusion regarding no roughness effects in the laminar region is open to question. In order to conclusively resolve this discrepancy, we have experimentally determined the effects of relative roughness ranging from 0–5.18% in micro and minichannels on friction factor and critical Reynolds numbers. Reynolds numbers were varied from 30 to 7000 and hydraulic diameters ranged from 198μm to 1084μm. There is indeed a roughness effect seen in the laminar region, contrary to what is reported by Nikuradse. The resulting friction factors are well predicted using a set of constricted flow parameters. In addition to higher friction factors, transition to turbulence was observed at decreasing Reynolds numbers as relative roughness increased.


1983 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 265-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günter Schewe

Force measurements were conducted in a pressurized wind tunnel from subcritical up to transcritical Reynolds numbers 2.3 × 104[les ]Re[les ] 7.1 × 106without changing the experimental arrangement. The steady and unsteady forces were measured by means of a piezobalance, which features a high natural frequency, low interferences and a large dynamic range. In the critical Reynolds-number range, two discontinuous transitions were observed, which can be interpreted as bifurcations at two critical Reynolds numbers. In both cases, these transitions are accompanied by critical fluctuations, symmetry breaking (the occurrence of a steady lift) and hysteresis. In addition, both transitions were coupled with a drop of theCDvalue and a jump of the Strouhal number. Similar phenomena were observed in the upper transitional region between the super- and the transcritical Reynolds-number ranges. The transcritical range begins at aboutRe≈ 5 × 106, where a narrow-band spectrum is formed withSr(Re= 7.1 × 106) = 0.29.


2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 074101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Capone ◽  
Christian Klein ◽  
Fabio Di Felice ◽  
Massimo Miozzi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document