Magnus effects at high angles of attack and critical Reynolds numbers

Author(s):  
A. SEGINER ◽  
M. RINGEL
2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 125110 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Lehmkuhl ◽  
I. Rodríguez ◽  
R. Borrell ◽  
J. Chiva ◽  
A. Oliva

2020 ◽  
Vol 197 ◽  
pp. 08015
Author(s):  
Simone Giaccherini ◽  
Filippo Mariotti ◽  
Lorenzo Pinelli ◽  
Michele Marconcini ◽  
Alessandro Bianchini

The working conditions of airfoils along modern wind turbine blades are putting new focus on the importance of properly characterizing the aerodynamic performance of different airfoil families also at high angles of attack (AoAs) beyond stall and at Reynolds numbers much lower (from few thousands to one million) than those commonly analyzed before. Several test cases are showing that even higher-order computational methods (like RANS/URANS CFD) are unable to properly capture the complex flow physics taking place past the blades, when deep stall occurs or when the AoA changes so rapidly to provoke the onset of dynamic stall. To fill this gap, the use of high-fidelity methods, like the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) is proposed, even though it implies a massive increase of the calculation cost. In order to analyze the prospects of using LES in comparison to RANS for low Reynolds, high AoAs, this work presents an in-depth study of the NACA 0021 aerodynamics at the Reynolds number of 80,000, by means of both traditional RANS approaches and high-fidelity (LES) simulations using the OpenFOAM suite. The selected airfoil has been showing in fact several issues in the correct characterization of its performance in similar conditions in many recent wind energy applications. The LES approach showed the ability to overcome the limitations of traditional RANS simulations, improving the accuracy of the results and reducing their dispersion thanks to the fact that the flow structures in the separated-flow regions are properly captured. Overall, this work underlines that accurate investigations of the aerodynamic performance of the NACA 0021 at low Reynolds require multiple sensitivity studies when RANS approaches are used, and suggests the use of LES simulations in order to increase the accuracy of estimations, especially when studying the stalledflow operating conditions of the airfoil.


2014 ◽  
Vol 761 ◽  
pp. 62-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joris C. G. Verschaeve ◽  
Geir K. Pedersen

AbstractIn the present treatise, the stability of the boundary layer under solitary waves is analysed by means of the parabolized stability equation. We investigate both surface solitary waves and internal solitary waves. The main result is that the stability of the flow is not of parametric nature as has been assumed in the literature so far. Not only does linear stability analysis highlight this misunderstanding, it also gives an explanation why Sumer et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 646, 2010, pp. 207–231), Vittori & Blondeaux (Coastal Engng, vol. 58, 2011, pp. 206–213) and Ozdemir et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 731, 2013, pp. 545–578) each obtained different critical Reynolds numbers in their experiments and simulations. We find that linear instability is possible in the acceleration region of the flow, leading to the question of how this relates to the observation of transition in the acceleration region in the experiments by Sumer et al. or to the conjecture of a nonlinear instability mechanism in this region by Ozdemir et al. The key concept for assessment of instabilities is the integrated amplification which has not been employed for this kind of flow before. In addition, the present analysis is not based on a uniformization of the flow but instead uses a fully nonlinear description including non-parallel effects, weakly or fully. This allows for an analysis of the sensitivity with respect to these effects. Thanks to this thorough analysis, quantitative agreement between model results and direct numerical simulation has been obtained for the problem in question. The use of a high-order accurate Navier–Stokes solver is primordial in order to obtain agreement for the accumulated amplifications of the Tollmien–Schlichting waves as revealed in this analysis. An elaborate discussion on the effects of amplitudes and water depths on the stability of the flow is presented.


1965 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 503-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Gill

It is found that only a small change in either of the undisturbed velocity profiles concerned is required to change them from stable profiles to unstable profiles. The change must be such as to produce a local maximum in the magnitude of the vorticity, or in the case of the pipe, in the magnitude of the vorticity divided by the radius. The actual change in the vorticity (or vorticity/radius) need only be small, but the gradient of the vorticity (or vorticity/radius) must be finite. Viscosity will tend to damp out the distortion in the mean flow that is responsible for the instability, so that if the flow is to become turbulent, non-linear effects must become important before the distortion of the mean flow is reduced to an ineffective level. This requirement leads to the determination of critical Reynolds numbers which depend on the initial (small) distortion of the mean flow and the initial (smaller) amplitude of periodic disturbances. These critical Reynolds numbers are large.


AIAA Journal ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (9) ◽  
pp. 1857-1870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Ju Lin ◽  
Jiun-Jih Miau ◽  
Jung-Kuo Tu ◽  
Hsing-Wen Tsai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document