Posterior Minimally Invasive Approaches for the Cervical Spine

2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishal C. Gala ◽  
John E. O'Toole ◽  
Jean-Marc Voyadzis ◽  
Richard G. Fessler
2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. E3 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Benglis ◽  
James D. Guest ◽  
Michael Y. Wang

Minimally invasive approaches to the cervical spine for lateral disc herniation or foraminal stenosis have recently been described. Lower rates of blood loss, decreased narcotic dependence, and less tissue destruction as well as shorter hospital stays are all advantages of utilizing these techniques. These observations can also be realized with a minimal access approach to cervical laminoplasty. Multiple levels of the cervical spine can be treated from a posterior approach with the potential to decrease the incidences of postoperative axial neck pain and kyphotic deformity. In this report the authors present a concise history of the open laminoplasty technique, provide data from previous cadaveric studies (6 cases) along with recent clinical experience for minimally invasive laminoplasty, and describe the advantages and challenges of this novel procedure.


2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim E. Adamson

✓ Since 1997, cervical endoscopic laminoforaminotomy (CELF) has been an effective and safe treatment option for unilateral cervical radiculopathy secondary to disc herniation or foraminal stenosis. The development of the surgical technique is reviewed and recent outcomes discussed. Its impact is addressed in relation to the patient and surgeon.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 60 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S1-160-S1-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Santiago ◽  
Richard G. Fessler

Abstract DORSAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES have a well-established role in the treatment of both radiculopathy and myelopathy caused by cervical spondylosis. Laminectomy and laminoplasty procedures can both lead to postoperative kyphosis because of the removal of the dorsal supporting structures of the neck. Minimally invasive or minimal-access spinal surgery procedures of the dorsal cervical spine are evolving techniques with the goal of decompressing the neural structures with minimal disruption of the dorsal supporting structures. We think that this will lead to less postoperative pain and a decreased incidence of postdecompression kyphotic deformity. Patient selection, techniques, and results are discussed for both minimally invasive cervical laminoforaminotomy and stenosis decompression.


Spine ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. E318-E322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark M. Mikhael ◽  
Paul C. Celestre ◽  
Christopher F. Wolf ◽  
Tom E. Mroz ◽  
Jeffrey C. Wang

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. E3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Stangenberg ◽  
Lennart Viezens ◽  
Sven O. Eicker ◽  
Malte Mohme ◽  
Klaus C. Mende ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe treatment of cervical spinal metastases represents a controversial issue regarding the type, extent, and invasiveness of interventions. In the lumbar and thoracic spine, kypho- and vertebroplasties have been established as minimally invasive procedures for patients with metastases to the vertebral bodies and without neurological deficit. These procedures show good results with respect to pain reduction and low complication rates. However, limited data are available for kypho- and vertebroplasties for cervical spinal metastases. In an effort to add to existing data, the authors here present a case series of 14 patients who were treated for osteolytic metastases of the cervical spine using vertebroplasty alone or in addition to another surgical procedure involving the cervical spine in a palliative setting to reduce pain and restore stability.METHODSFourteen patients consisting of 8 males and 6 females, with a mean age of 64.7 years (range 44–85 years), were treated with vertebroplasty at the authors’ clinic between January 2015 and November 2016. In total, 25 vertebrae were treated with vertebroplasty: 10 C-2, 5 C-3, 2 C-4, 2 C-5, 3 C-6, and 3 C-7. Two patients had an additional posterior stabilization and 5 patients an additional anterior stabilization. In 13 cases, the surgical approach was a modified Smith-Robinson approach; in 1 case, the cement was injected into the corpus axis from posteriorly. Patients with osteolytic defects of the posterior wall of the vertebral body did not undergo surgery, nor did patients with neurological deficits. Preoperatively, on the 2nd day after surgery, and at the follow-up, neck pain was rated using the visual analog scale (VAS).RESULTSTwelve patients were examined at follow-up (mean 9 months). Neck pain was rated as a mean of 6.0 (range 3–8) preoperatively, 2.9 on Day 2 after surgery (range 0–5), and 0.5 at the follow-up (range 0–4), according to the VAS. The mean Neck Disability Index at follow-up was 3.6% (range 0%–18%).CONCLUSIONSAnterior vertebroplasty of the cervical spine via an anterolateral approach represents a safe and minimally invasive procedure with a low complication rate and appears suitable for reducing pain and restoring stability in cases of cervical spinal metastases. Vertebroplasties can be combined with other anterior and posterior operations of the cervical spine and, in the axis vertebra, can be performed transpedicularly from posteriorly. Thus, in cases in which the posterior wall of the vertebral body is intact, vertebroplasty represents a less invasive alternative to vertebral replacement in oncological surgery. Prospective randomized trials with a longer follow-up period and a larger patient cohort are needed to confirm the encouraging results of this case series.


10.14444/8134 ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 8134
Author(s):  
José Antonio Soriano Sánchez ◽  
Kai Uwe Lewandrowski ◽  
José Alfonso Franco Jímenez ◽  
Manuel Eduardo Soto Garcia ◽  
Sergio Soriano Solís ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document