Intraoperative Use of Topical Retropharyngeal Steroids for Dysphagia after Anterior Cervical Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose. The anterior cervical approach is commonly used clinically for cervical spondylosis, but it also results in frequent postoperative dysphagia, which can increase the risk of complications and poor treatment satisfaction in severe cases. Intraoperative local application of retropharyngeal steroids has an impact on reducing the occurrence and severity of dysphagia; however, the results of current studies vary. The meta-analysis of this randomized trial was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intraoperative topical retropharyngeal steroids for the control of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery. Methods. Two authors searched electronic databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, respectively. The search terms were “Dysphagia,” “Steroids,” “Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion,” etc. A random effects model was used to conduct a meta-analysis based on deviance information criteria. Results. A total of 8 studies were included in this meta-analysis after screening of 792 studies. Bazaz scores were not significantly different in the steroid group at one day postoperatively ( P = 0.38 ), and dysphagia was significantly improved at 14 days postoperatively (95% CI: 0.15 to 0.64; P = 0.002 ). PSTSI was significantly improved one day ( P = 0.03 ) and 14 days after surgery ( P < 0.0001 ). VAS scores were all lower versus controls ( P < 0.001 ). Conclusion. Perioperative local retropharyngeal steroid administration as an adjunct to anterior cervical spine surgery reduces the incidence and severity of dysphagia compared with placebo control. However, future high-quality randomized controlled studies could incorporate nonsubjective dysphagia measures and long-term follow-up on the occurrence of associated complications or other side effects.

Risk Factor Analysis of Perioperative Complications in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Undergoing Primary Cervical Spine Surgery

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often causes cervical spine lesions as the disease condition progresses, which induce occipital neuralgia or cervical myelopathy requiring surgical interventions. Meanwhile, patients with RA are susceptible to infection or other complications in the perioperative period because they frequently have comorbidities and use immunosuppressive medications. However, the risk factors or characteristics of patients with RA who experience perioperative complications after cervical spine surgery remain unknown. A risk factor analysis of perioperative complications in patients with RA who underwent primary cervical spine surgery was conducted in the present study.Methods: A total of 139 patients with RA who underwent primary cervical spine surgery from January 2001 to March 2020 were retrospectively investigated. Age and height, weight, serum albumin, serum C-reactive protein, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS), Charlson comorbidity index, medications used, cervical spine lesion, surgery time, bleeding volume, and procedures were collected from medical records to compare the patients with complications to those without complications after surgery. The risk factors for perioperative complications were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results: Twenty-eight patients (20.1%) had perioperative complications. Perioperative complications were significantly associated with the following factors [data presented as odds ratio (confidence interval)]: lower height [0.928 (0.880-0.980), p=0.007], higher ASA-PS [2.296 (1.007-5.235), p=0.048], longer operation time [1.013 (1.004-1.021), p=0.003], more bleeding volume [1.004 (1.000-1.007), p=0.04], higher rates of vertical subluxation [2.914 (1.229-6.911), p=0.015] and subaxial subluxation (SAS) [2.507 (1.063-5.913), p=0.036], occipito-cervical (OC) fusion [3.438 (1.189-9.934), p=0.023], and occipito-cervical/thoracic (long) fusion [8.021 (2.145-29.99), p=0.002] in univariate analyses. In multivariate analyses, lower height [0.915 (0.860-0.974), p=0.005], higher ASA-PS [2.622 (1.023-6.717), p=0.045] and long fusion [7.289 (1.694-31.36), p=0.008] remained risk factors. High-dose prednisolone use [1.247 (1.024-1.519), p=0.028], SAS [6.413 (1.381-29.79), p=0.018], OC fusion [17.93 (1.242-258.8), p=0.034] and long fusion [108.1 (6.876-1699), p<0.001] were associated with severe complications.Conclusions: ASA-PS and long fusion could be indicators predicting perioperative complications in patients with RA after cervical spine surgery. In addition, cervical spine lesions requiring OC fusion or long fusion and high-dose prednisolone use were suggested to be risk factors for increasing severe complications.

Subjective and Objective Quality-of-Life Assessment of Outcome Measures in Cervical Spine Surgery for Degenerative Changes

Cervical spine diskectomy is a commonly used procedure in degenerative disease of cervical spine surgery. However, it is difficult to assess the quality of life after this widely applied and variously modified procedure. This literature review presents cervical diskectomy results, according to various scales and measures in multidirectional surgical strategies. Using relevant databases, we tried to find the best treatment options for degenerative disk disease and the best method of quality-of-life assessment, searching for modalities that may influence the outcome.