Syndesmosis Injury

Author(s):  
Lorraine Boakye ◽  
Nia A. James ◽  
Cortez L. Brown ◽  
Alan A. Yan ◽  
MaCalus V. Hogan
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 2219-2229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Wang ◽  
Yingze Zhang ◽  
Zhaohui Song ◽  
Hengrui Chang ◽  
Ye Tian ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 107110072096479
Author(s):  
Gi Beom Kim ◽  
Chul Hyun Park

Background: This study aimed to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of hybrid fixation for Danis-Weber type C ankle fractures with a syndesmotic injury. Methods: From January 2016 to April 2018, we retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent hybrid fixation for Danis-Weber type C ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. We excluded patients who achieved syndesmosis stability after fracture fixation. In all patients, we allowed partial weightbearing at 4 weeks postoperatively. We evaluated the visual analog scale for ankle pain, the Olerud-Molander ankle score, and the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score. Malreduction of the syndesmosis was defined based on 2 previously reported methods. Fourteen patients (11 men and 3 women) were included in this study. There were 11 patients with pronation external rotation-type fractures and 3 patients with Maisonneuve fractures. The average age at operation was 37.2 years (range, 18-70 years). Results: Clinical scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up. Postoperative malreduction was observed only in 1 patient (7.1%). Conclusion: Hybrid fixation using a suture-button device combined with a syndesmotic screw in Danis-Weber type C fractures with syndesmosis injury showed a high accuracy of reduction, a low rate of diastasis, and favorable clinical outcomes. This combined method could be a good alternative treatment option for Danis-Weber type C ankle fractures with a syndesmosis injury. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0031
Author(s):  
Brian Lau ◽  
Hunter Storaci ◽  
Kaysie Tam ◽  
Cara Lai ◽  
Brett P. Salazar ◽  
...  

Category: Sports; Basic Sciences/Biologics Introduction/Purpose: Syndesmosis injuries are common and frequently occur with deltoid injuries but optimal repair remains controversial. Prior biomechanical studies have demonstrated that 1 and 2 suture buttons are equivalent to screw fixation and that parallel or divergent suture buttons are equivalent to single suture button. Prior studies, however, created constructs with suture buttons within 1cm from each other (2-3cm from joint surface). Additionally, the role of deltoid injury and repair have not been evaluated in conjunction with syndesmosis injury and repair. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare a narrow vs spread 2-suture button construct with and without a deltoid repair. Methods: Four matched lower leg specimens (8 total specimens) aged mean 60.2 years (range 57-66 years; 6 females and 2 males; mean BMI 21.1) were tested. Ankle motion under cyclic loading was measured in multiple planes: first in the intact state, following simulated syndesmosis and deltoid injury, then following fixation with 1 of 2 randomly assigned constructs: 2 parallel suture buttons at 2 and 3cm from joint line (narrow); and 2 parallel suture buttons at 1 and 4cm from joint line (spread), and then finally following a deltoid repair with each construct. Each state was tested at a constant 750 N axial compressive force and 5N internal/external torque. Rotation position (degrees) and anterior-posterior displacement (mm) were collected throughout the testing to characterize relative spatial relationships of the tibiofibular articulation using 3D video capture technology. Results: Narrow and spread 2-suture button constructs improved rotation and translation compared to cut state (p<0.05) but not to intact state (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in rotation or translation between Narrow and Spread constructs (p>0.05). The addition of a deltoid repair did not improve rotation or translation compared to syndesmosis repair with either construct alone (p>0.05). Conclusion: The preliminary results of this study suggest that constructs with suture button placed close together or spread apart during fixation of combined syndesmosis and deltoid injury could improve rotation and translation equally. Additionally, in a combined syndesmosis and deltoid injury, the addition of a deltoid repair to a syndesmosis repair did not strengthen the construct. These findings suggest that repair of syndesmosis alone may be sufficient in combined syndesmosis and deltoid injuries. Additional matched samples will be tested to validate preliminary findings.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Benedikte Wendt Ræder ◽  
Ingrid Kvello Stake ◽  
Jan Erik Madsen ◽  
Frede Frihagen ◽  
Silje Berild Jacobsen ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 622-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Thordarson ◽  
Thomas P. Hedman ◽  
Dominic Gross ◽  
George Magre

Simulated syndesmosis injuries were created in 12 fresh-frozen, below-knee cadaver specimens. Six specimens were repaired with a 4.5 mm stainless steel screw, and six were repaired with a 4.5 mm polylactide screw. Three specimens of each group were tested in load to failure by axially loading with 1400 N and externally rotating to 90°. Three specimens in each group underwent fatigue testing by axially loading with 700 N and applying 2.5 N-m of torque for 57,700 cycles. Radiographs and computed tomography scans were evaluated. None of the screws broke or failed. Similar load to failure was noted in polylactide and control groups. Fatigue testing revealed no significant change in stiffness. No significant screw damage was evident on radiographic or computed tomography evaluation. The data suggest that a polylactide screw has sufficient fatigue and failure strength to allow for healing of this injury in a clinical situation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 102 (8) ◽  
pp. 1069-1073 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Steinmetz ◽  
B. Puliero ◽  
D. Brinkert ◽  
N. Meyer ◽  
P. Adam ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Thornes ◽  
Alan Walsh ◽  
Matt Hislop ◽  
Paraic Murray ◽  
Moira O'Brien

Suture-Endobutton fixation is proposed as a minimally invasive, flexible fixation of ankle tibio-fibular diastasis, which would not require routine removal. This study tested the Suture-Endobutton construct in a cadaver syndesmosis injury model and compared this against A.O. syndesmosis screw fixation. Sixteen embalmed cadaver legs were used. Phase one consisted of placing the leg in a jig, generating an external rotation torque and measuring diastasis with increasing intraosseous membrane division. Phase two then compared the Suture-Endobutton construct vs. single four-cortex 4.5 mm A.O. screw fixation. Diastasis increased significantly with increasing intraosseous membrane division (p<0.001). No significant differences were seen in the mean rate of failure between the Suture-Endobutton and A.O. screw fixation. However, the Suture-Endobutton did give a significantly more consistent performance; the distribution of standard deviations for A.O. screw fixation was 0.64 mm higher than that for the Endobutton (95% C.I. 0.46 to 0.84). These results show that Suture-Endobutton fixation at least equals the performance of screw fixation and encourages clinical trials in ankle injuries with a syndesmosis diastasis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document