Addressing Disparities in Adolescent Eating Disorders: A Case Report of Family-Based Treatment in Primary Care

Author(s):  
Janna R. Gewirtz O'Brien ◽  
Leslie Sim ◽  
Cassandra Narr ◽  
Angela Mattke ◽  
Marcie Billings ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Abigail R. Cooper ◽  
Ashley F. Jennings ◽  
Katharine L. Loeb ◽  
Daniel Le Grange

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Lebow ◽  
Janna R. Gewirtz O’Brien ◽  
Angela Mattke ◽  
Cassandra Narr ◽  
Jennifer Geske ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra K. Katzman ◽  
Rebecka Peebles ◽  
Susan M. Sawyer ◽  
James Lock ◽  
Daniel Le Grange

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Lebow ◽  
Angela Mattke ◽  
Cassandra Narr ◽  
Paige Partain ◽  
Renee Breland ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Family-Based Treatment (FBT) is considered the first-line intervention for adolescent anorexia nervosa. However, access to this treatment is limited. Treatment programs for other pediatric mental health conditions have successfully overcome barriers to accessing evidence-based intervention by integrating mental health services into primary care. This study evaluated the proof-of-concept of a novel modification of FBT, Family-Based Treatment for Primary Care (FBT-PC) for adolescent restrictive eating disorders designed for delivery by primary care providers in their practices. Methods This retrospective clinical cohort study evaluated 15 adolescents with restrictive eating disorders receiving FBT-PC and 15 adolescents receiving standard FBT. We examined improvement in BMI percentile, reduction in weight suppression, and clinical benchmarks of eating disorder recovery including weight restoration to > 95% of expected body weight (EBW) and resolution of DSM-5 criteria for eating disorders. Results In both groups, effect sizes for increased BMI percentile exceeded Cohen’s convention for a large effect (FBT-PC: d = .94; standard FBT: d = 1.15) as did effect sizes for reduction in weight suppression (FBT-PC: d = 1.83; standard FBT: d = 1.21). At the end of treatment, 80% of the FBT-PC cohort and 87% in the standard FBT group achieved > 95%EBW and 67% in the FBT-PC group and 60% in the standard FBT group no longer met DSM-5 criteria for an eating disorder. There were no cohort differences in the number of treatment drop-outs or referrals to a more intensive level of eating disorder treatment. Conclusions Findings suggest that primary care providers have potential to improve weight and clinical status in adolescents with restrictive eating disorders. Based on these results, more rigorous testing of the FBT-PC model is warranted.


2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 574-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simar Singh ◽  
Erin C. Accurso ◽  
Lisa Hail ◽  
Andrea B. Goldschmidt ◽  
Daniel Le Grange

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roslyn B. Binford Hopf ◽  
Daniel Le Grange ◽  
Markus Moessner ◽  
Stephanie Bauer

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Sarah Forsberg ◽  
Sasha Gorrell ◽  
Erin C. Accurso ◽  
Claire Trainor ◽  
Andrea Garber ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document