Mapping P-wave azimuthal anisotropy of the New Madrid seismic zone

2019 ◽  
Vol 295 ◽  
pp. 106296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zewei Wang ◽  
Dapeng Zhao
1977 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-218
Author(s):  
R. B. Herrmann ◽  
G. W. Fischer ◽  
J. E. Zollweg

abstract The June 13, 1975 earthquake in the New Madrid seismic zone produced the first recorded strong-motion accelerograms for an event in the region, as well as the largest recorded accelerations to date for any event in eastern North America. The peak strong-motion values obtained from an analysis of the accelerograms are the following: amax = 43 cm/sec2, vmax = 1 cm/sec and dmax = 0.05 cm for the longitudinal S88°W component; amax = 31 cm/sec2, vmax = 0.6 cm/sec and dmax = 0.01 cm for the DOWN component; amax = 64 cm/sec2, vmax = 1.6 cm/sec2, and dmax = 0.09 cm for the tangential S02°E component. Source parameter estimation using long-period surface waves, Lg spectra, P-wave first motions and the integrated accelerograms leads to a consistent solution. The seismic moment is estimated to be 4E21 dyne-cm and the corner period 0.6 sec. The corner period-seismic moment pair for this event agrees with the regional scaling of these parameters observed by Street et al. (1975).


1988 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 123-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Himes ◽  
W. Stauder ◽  
R. B. Herrmann

Abstract The hypocenter locations of the larger and better recorded earthquakes of the New Madrid seismic zone are examined in order to determine how closely the hypocenters lie along planar surfaces, thus relating the foci to active fault surfaces. For this purpose more than 500 earthquakes of the region have been selected for study, based on the number (7 or more) of observing stations used in the initial hypocenter location and on the quality of the P-wave onset. These events are relocated using a joint hypocenter-velocity-depth (JHVD) algorithm. The relocated earthquakes are separated geographically into three trends: ARK, the southwest trending zone from Caruthersville, Missouri, to Marked Tree, Arkansas; DWM, the northeast trending zone from New Madrid to Charleston, Missouri; and CEN, the central, left-stepping offset zone from Ridgely, Tennessee, to New Madrid, Missouri. Vertical profiles taken along and across the ARK and DWM trends verify the strike and dip of dominantly strike slip motion on near vertical active faults along these trends. These results agree with previously determined composite focal mechanism solutions for these trends. No coherent picture has been obtained for the CEN trend. As a by-product of the study, velocity models from the JHVD inversion are found to be reasonably uniform throughout the New Madrid seismic zone, and to offer supporting evidence for the presence of a shallow low velocity zone in the central portion of the Mississippi embayment.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renee M. Reichenbacher ◽  
◽  
Valarie Harrison ◽  
Taylor Andrew Weathers ◽  
Roy B. Van Arsdale ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samia Noor ◽  
◽  
Randel Tom Cox ◽  
Robert Smalley ◽  
Md Rizwanul Hasan

Geomorphology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 43 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 313-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J Guccione ◽  
K Mueller ◽  
J Champion ◽  
S Shepherd ◽  
S.D Carlson ◽  
...  

1981 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 1933-1942
Author(s):  
F. Steve Schilt ◽  
Robert E. Reilinger

Abstract Relative vertical displacements of bench marks in extreme western Kentucky have been determined by comparison of successive leveling surveys in 1947 and 1968. The resulting pattern of apparent surface deformation shows steep offset which can be closely modeled by a normal fault buried in an elastic half-space. The offset is located near the northern boundary of the Mississippi Embayment and the New Madrid seismic zone, an area where faults have previously been inferred on the basis of both geological and geophysical evidence. If the apparent movement is due to slip along a fault, several lines of evidence (regional structure, earthquake data, and lineations) suggest that the postulated fault trends NNE. Thirteen earthquakes were recorded in this area between the times of leveling; focal mechanisms exist for three of these. The nearest of these three focal mechanisms to the leveling offset implies normal faulting. The magnitude of the earthquake, however, appears to be too small to account for the amount of slip required by the fault model. Thus the apparent deformation may have accumulated with several undetected small earthquakes, or gradually as aseismic creep.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document