Implant placement for patients with cleft lip and palate: A clinical report and guidelines for treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria G.R. Pucciarelli ◽  
Adolfo C.O. Lopes ◽  
José F.S. Lopes ◽  
Simone Soares
2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Rechden Lobato Palmeiro ◽  
Caroline Scheeren Piffer ◽  
Vivian Martins Brunetto ◽  
Paulo César Maccari ◽  
Rosemary Sadami Arai Shinkai

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaibhav D. Kamble ◽  
Rambhau D. Parkhedkar ◽  
Soumil P. Sarin ◽  
Pravinkumar G. Patil

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 676-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajendra Avhad ◽  
Ranjukta Sar ◽  
Jyoti Tembhurne

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-76
Author(s):  
Sujoy Banerjee ◽  
Rajlakshmi Banerjee ◽  
Usha M. Radke ◽  
Darshana Mundhe

2020 ◽  
pp. 105566562096470
Author(s):  
Tine Malgaj ◽  
Alja Plut ◽  
Andreja Eberlinc ◽  
Martina Drevenšek ◽  
Peter Jevnikar

Missing lateral incisors are the most frequent dental disorder associated with cleft alveolus. When orthodontic closure of the edentulous space is not possible, more aggressive prosthodontic treatments are required. Contemporary resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) represent a promising, time-efficient alternative treatment with fewer biological complications. This clinical report proposes a modified approach to the esthetic rehabilitation of a patient with a complete unilateral cleft lip and palate on the left side and an incomplete cleft lip and alveolar cleft on the right side. Digital diagnostics, treatment planning, and clinical procedures involved in the fabrication of facially bonded RBFDPs are presented. This modified technique enables the concurrent replacement of lateral incisors and correction of the malformed central incisors as well as increasing the retention of the restorations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Mahajan ◽  
Harish Ghildiyal ◽  
Ankit Khasgiwala ◽  
Gogulnathan Muthukrishnan ◽  
Sukhdeep kahlon

Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of secondary alveolar bone grafting and late secondary alveolar bone grafting in 66 unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Materials and Methods: The total patients were 66 unilateral cleft lip and palate patients, out of which 19 patients underwent secondary alveolar bone grafting and 47 patients underwent late secondary alveolar bone grafting. Autogenous anterior iliac crest cancellous bone graft was harvested and used for grafting the alveolar clefts. Radiographic assessment based on Enemark’s scoring according to the marginal bone levels was done on the intraoral periapical radiographs taken 6 months after performing the surgery. Results: Twelve (63%) out of the 19 patients on whom secondary alveolar bone grafting was done achieved score 1 (optimal marginal bone levels), whereas only 12 (25%) out of the 47 patients achieved score 1 amongst the late secondary alveolar bone graftings. Overall results showed, probability, P = .034 (statistically significant). Conclusion: This study reaffirmed the fact that alveolar bone grafting when done in preadolescent age group (secondary alveolar bone grafting) gives better results in terms of marginal bony consolidation and maintaining the continuity of the alveolar arch, but the late presentation (late secondary alveolar bone grafting) should not be the refusal criteria for performing the alveolar bone grafting. Although the latter patients may not be rewarded in terms of bony consolidation as much as the preadolescent patients the potential of successful surgery in them still exists in terms of providing a platform for the dental implant placement, improvement in the soft tissue symmetry and aesthetics of the face.


2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Re-Mee Doh ◽  
Chugeum Dam ◽  
Kyu-Young Kyung ◽  
Wonse Park

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document