scholarly journals Finite Element Analysis of OT Bridge fixed prosthesis system

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 734-747
Author(s):  
Dario Milone ◽  
Fabiana Nicita ◽  
Gabriele Cervino ◽  
Dario Santonocito ◽  
Giacomo Risitano
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis

scholarly journals Valuation of stress patterns in the peri implant bone of non-parallel implants supporting a long-cantilevered prosthesis: a 3D finite element analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 18-24
Author(s):  
Mohammed Abusaad Siddiqui ◽  
Sudheer N ◽  
Dulala Vikram Raj ◽  
Aditi Chintamani Sabnis ◽  
Alluru Amrutesh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Dimensional Finite Element ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis ◽  
Edentulous Patients ◽  
Area Of Concern ◽  
Three Dimensional Finite Element

The treatment modality for completely edentulous arches has shifted from complete dentures to dental implants during the last 15-20 years. Tilting of implants has reduced the concern of resorbed posterior ridges in completely edentulous patients with “All-on-four” and “All-on-six” concept of dental implants. The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical behaviour of the “All-on-four”, “All-on-six” models with tilted distal implants at different angulations of 30 and 45 ° with four parallel placed implant-supported fixed prosthesis, and six parallel placed implant-supported fixed prosthesis models as controls using three-dimensional finite element analysis. The results showed that in all the models, in cancellous bone, cortical bone, implant and prosthesis – “All-on-four” model with distal implants tilted at an angulation of 30° showed stress values less than or equivalent to all the other models except on the implant in the presence of cantilever and on prosthesis during full mouth biting load where maximum stresses were observed. The study shows that All-on-four concept with tilted distal implants at an angulation of 30° showed stress values favourable for the rehabilitation of completely edentulous maxilla, but the presence of cantilever remains an area of concern.

Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Osseointegrated Implants Placed in Bone of Different Densities With Cemented Fixed Prosthetic Restoration

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 480-490
Author(s):  
Kasthuri Chidambaravalli ◽  
Vinod Krishnan
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Osseointegrated Implants ◽  
Bone Segment ◽  
Implant Abutment ◽  
Stress Deformation ◽  
Dimensional Finite Element ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis ◽  
Von Mises

A key factor for a successful dental implant is the manner in which stresses are transferred to the surrounding bone. Strength of bone is directly related to its density. Maximum stresses are reported to be incurred by the crestal cortical bone surrounding the implant. Displacement of implants is significantly higher in soft cancellous bone than dense bone. Implants are often placed in bone of different densities to support fixed dental prostheses. This study was aimed at assessing stress and deformation generated by osseointegrated implants placed in bone of different densities on a cemented fixed prosthesis when subjected to static and dynamic loading. A 3-dimensional finite element analysis was done on a computer-aided design model simulating maxillary bone segment with 2 different bone densities (D2 and D4). The effect of loading was evaluated at the implant–bone interface, implant–abutment interface, abutment, implant abutment connecting screw, cementing medium, and fixed prosthesis. Stresses were calculated using von Mises criteria calibrated in megapascals and deformation in millimeters. These were represented in color-coded maps from blue to red (showing minimum to maximum stress/deformation), depicted as contour lines with different colors connecting stress/deformation points. The study found greater von Mises stress in D2 than D4 bone, and in D2 bone the component with higher stress was the implant. Deformation was greater in D4 than D2 bone, and in D4 bone the abutment-prosthesis interface showed more deformation.

Effect of Framework in an Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 627-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Menini ◽  
Paolo Pesce ◽  
Marco Bevilacqua ◽  
Francesco Pera ◽  
Tiziano Tealdo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
3D Finite Element ◽  
3D Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis

scholarly journals A 3-D Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution on Implant-supported Fixed Prosthesis with Four Different Commercially Available Implant Systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 835-840
Author(s):  
Sandeep Kumar ◽  
Rajnish Aggarwal ◽  
Sunita Choudhary ◽  
Ritwik Tyagi ◽  
Akhilesh Malethia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Distribution ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis

scholarly journals Finite element analysis of stresses in fixed prosthesis and cement layer using a three-dimensional model

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arunachalam Sangeetha ◽  
ThallamVeeravalli Padmanabhan ◽  
R Subramaniam ◽  
Vivekanandan Ramkumar
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Model ◽  
Three Dimensional Model ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Cement Layer ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document