Exploratory Investigation on the Suppression Efficiency of Fugitive Dust Emitted from Coal Stockpile: Comparison of Innovative Atomizing and Traditional Spraying Technologies

Author(s):  
Po-Hsuan Yen ◽  
Wei-Hsiang Chen ◽  
Chung-Shin Yuan ◽  
Yu-Lun Tseng ◽  
Jiann-Shen Lee ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 147 (3) ◽  
pp. 04020181
Author(s):  
Alena J. Raymond ◽  
Alissa Kendall ◽  
Jason T. DeJong ◽  
Edward Kavazanjian ◽  
Miriam A. Woolley ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
pp. 15-36
Author(s):  
Mauro Cavallone ◽  
Daniela Andreini ◽  
Giuseppe Pedeliento ◽  
Francesca Magno

Author(s):  
Michelle B. Lowry ◽  
G. William William Schwert

Author(s):  
M. John Foster

AbstractIn essence firms or companies are usually thought to exist to make products for or provide services of some sort to third parties, other companies or individuals. The philosophical question which naturally arises then is ‘to the benefit of whom should a firm’s activities be aimed?’ Possible answers include the owners of the firm, the firm’s employees or wider society, the firm’s local community or their host nation. It is because of firms’ location within a wider society that the issue of corporate social responsibility arises. The issue is do they contribute in a positive way to the fabric of society. In this paper we conduct an exploratory investigation whose research questions, broadly, are whether there is public evidence of corporate social responsibility activity by firms listed in the UK and to what extent, if any, such activities may amount to genuinely socially responsible management by the firms. We examined the most up to date annual reports of a split sample of 36 firms listed in the FTSE 350. The short answers to the two research questions above are: to some degree and no by some margin, based on data from the sample firms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document