scholarly journals Did the London congestion charge reduce pollution?

2020 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 103573
Author(s):  
Colin P. Green ◽  
John S. Heywood ◽  
Maria Navarro Paniagua
Keyword(s):  
2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (9) ◽  
pp. 620-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Tonne ◽  
S Beevers ◽  
B Armstrong ◽  
F Kelly ◽  
P Wilkinson

Author(s):  
An Vercalsteren ◽  
Theo Geerken
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
David Besanko ◽  
Johannes Horner ◽  
Ed Kalletta

Describes the events leading up to the imposition of the London congestion charge. Views about the congestion charge, both pro and con, are presented. Also discusses, in general terms, the economics of traffic congestion, pointing out that an unregulated market for driving will not reach the social optimum. Contains sufficient data to estimate the deadweight loss in an unregulated market and the reduction of the deadweight loss due to the imposition of the congestion charge in 2003.To provide a good illustration of how an unregulated market with negative externalities can lead to an overprovision of a good (in this case driving). Also, to show how an externality tax (in this case, London's congestion charge) can lead to an improvement in social welfare.


2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 433-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed A. Quddus ◽  
Michael G.H. Bell ◽  
Jan-Dirk Schmöcker ◽  
Achille Fonzone

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document