scholarly journals Comparative hybrid effects of combining botulinum toxin A injection with bilateral robot-assisted, mirror or task-oriented therapy for upper extremity spasticity in patients with chronic stroke

2018 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. e71
Author(s):  
J.W. Hung ◽  
C.Y. Wu ◽  
K.C. Chang ◽  
Y.P. Pong
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. e1718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dursun Erbil ◽  
Gokbel Tugba ◽  
Topcu Hasan Murat ◽  
Akarsu Melike ◽  
Akyüz Merve ◽  
...  

PM&R ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 542-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Kassam ◽  
Chetan P. Phadke ◽  
Farooq Ismail ◽  
Chris Boulias

Toxins ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Jen-Wen Hung ◽  
Wen-Chi Wu ◽  
Yi-Ju Chen ◽  
Ya-Ping Pong ◽  
Ku-Chou Chang

Identifying patients who can gain minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in active motor function in the affected upper extremity (UE) after a botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) injection for post-stroke spasticity is important. Eighty-eight participants received a BoNT-A injection in the affected UE. Two outcome measures, Fugl–Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Motor Activity Log (MAL), were assessed at pre-injection and after 24 rehabilitation sessions. We defined favorable response as an FMA-UE change score ≥5 or MAL change score ≥0.5.Statistical analysis revealed that the time since stroke less than 36 months (odds ratio (OR) = 4.902 (1.219–13.732); p = 0.023) was a significant predictor of gaining MCID in the FMA-UE. Medical Research Council scale -proximal UE (OR = 1.930 (1.004–3.710); p = 0.049) and post-injection duration (OR = 1.039 (1.006–1.074); p =0.021) were two significant predictors of MAL amount of use. The time since stroke less than 36 months (OR = 3.759 (1.149–12.292); p = 0.028), naivety to BoNT-A (OR = 3.322 (1.091–10.118); p = 0.035), and education years (OR = 1.282 (1.050–1.565); p = 0.015) were significant predictors of MAL quality of movement. The findings of our study can help optimize BoNT-A treatment planning.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 556-562
Author(s):  
Natasha A. Lannin ◽  
Louise Ada ◽  
Coralie English ◽  
Julie Ratcliffe ◽  
Steven G. Faux ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose— The aim of this trial was to determine the effect of additional upper limb rehabilitation following botulinum toxin-A for upper limb activity in chronic stroke. Methods— We conducted a multicenter phase III randomized trial with concealed allocation, blinded measurement, and intention-to-treat analysis. One hundred forty stroke survivors who were scheduled to receive botulinum toxin-A in any muscle(s) that cross the wrist because of moderate to severe spasticity after a stroke >3 months ago, who had completed formal rehabilitation and had no significant cognitive impairment. Experimental group received botulinum toxin-A plus evidence-based movement training while the control group received botulinum toxin-A plus a handout of exercises. Primary outcomes were goal attainment (Goal Attainment Scaling) and upper limb activity (Box and Block Test) at 3 months (end of intervention). Secondary outcomes were spasticity, range of motion, strength, pain, burden of care, and health-related quality of life. Results— In terms of goal attainment, the experimental group scored the same (mean difference, 2 T-score [95% CI, −2 to 7]) as the control group on the Goal Attainment Scale. In terms of upper limb activity, by 3 months the experimental group moved blocks at the same speed (mean difference, 0.00 blocks/s [95% CI, −0.02 to 0.01]) as the control group on the Box and Block Test. There were no differences between groups on any secondary outcome except strength, in favor of the experimental group (mean difference, 1.4 kg [95% CI, 0.2–2.7]). Conclusions— Findings suggest that additional intensive upper limb rehabilitation following botulinum toxin-A in chronic stroke survivors with a disabled upper limb is not effective. Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: ACTRN12615000616572.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document