Local vibration training improves the recovery of quadriceps strength in early rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A feasibility randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background: Guided rehabilitation beyond 6-months is rare following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), despite high prevalence of unacceptable symptoms and quality of life (QoL). We aimed to: i) determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the effectiveness of a physiotherapist-guided lower-limb focussed exercise-therapy intervention for individuals 1-year post-ACLR with persistent symptoms, and ii) estimate the effects of this intervention compared to a trunk-focussed intervention on knee-related QoL.Design: Participant- and assessor-blinded, pilot feasibility RCT.Methods: Participant eligibility criteria: i) 12–15 months post-ACLR; ii) < 87.5/100 on the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) QoL subscale; and one of: a) one-leg rise test < 22 repetitions; b) single-hop < 90% limb symmetry; or c) Anterior Knee Pain Scale < 87/100. Participants were randomised (2:1 ratio) to lower-limb focussed exercise-therapy and individualised education, or trunk-focussed exercise-therapy and standardised education. Both interventions involved eight face-to-face physiotherapy sessions over 16-weeks, to guide allocated exercise-therapy programs. Feasibility was assessed by: i) recruitment (participants/month), ii) retention (< 20% drop-out), iii) physiotherapy attendance, and iv) unsupervised exercise-therapy program adherence (> 80% of 3 sessions/week). Knee-related QoL was evaluated using the KOOS-QoL subscale and ACL-QoL questionnaire, with between-group differences compared to published minimally important difference (MID) scores (KOOS-QoL = 10 points; ACL-QoL = 12 points).Results: 27 participants (3 participants/month; 48% men, 34 ± 12 years) were randomised. Two did not commence treatment, and two were lost to follow-up (16% drop-out). Physiotherapy attendance was > 80% for both groups but reported adherence to the unsupervised program was low (< 55% of prescribed exercises). KOOS-QoL improvement (mean ± SD) in the lower-limb focussed (23 ± 15) and trunk-focussed (16 ± 12) groups resulted in a between-group difference (mean, 95%CI) lower than the MID (7.1, -12.3 to 26.4). ACL-QoL improvement in the lower-limb focussed (20 ± 17) and trunk-focussed (22 ± 13) groups resulted in a between-group difference lower than the MID (-2.5, -18.2 to 13.2).Conclusions: A larger-scale RCT evaluating the effectiveness of a physiotherapist-guided lower-limb focussed program for individuals 1-year after ACLR with persistent symptoms is feasible. This intervention is associated with large within-group knee-related QoL improvements, but may not be superior to a trunk-focussed intervention.Trial Registration: Prospectively registered (ACTRN12616000564459).

Download Full-text

Comparison of hamstring and quadriceps strength after anatomical versus non-anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽

10.1186/s12891-021-04350-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Hai Jiang ◽

Lei Zhang ◽

Rui-Ying Zhang ◽

Qiu-Jian Zheng ◽

Meng-Yuan Li

Keyword(s):

Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Quadriceps Strength ◽

Anatomical Reconstruction ◽

Single Bundle ◽

Knee Stability ◽

Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Anterior Cruciate ◽

Reconstruction Group

Abstract Background Strength recovery of injured knee is an important parameter for patients who want to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Comparison of muscle strength between anatomical and non-anatomical ACLR has not been reported. Purpose To evaluate the difference between anatomical and non-anatomical single-bundle ACLR in hamstring and quadriceps strength and clinical outcomes. Methods Patients received unilateral primary single-bundle hamstring ACLR between January 2017 to January 2018 were recruited in this study. Patients were divided into anatomical reconstruction group (AR group) and non-anatomical reconstruction group (NAR group) according to femoral tunnel aperture position. The hamstring and quadriceps isokinetic strength including peak extension torque, peak flexion torque and H/Q ratio were measured at an angular velocity of 180°/s and 60°/s using an isokinetic dynamometer. The isometric extension and flexion torques were also measured. Hamstring and quadriceps strength were measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Knee stability including Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT-1000 measurement and subjective knee function including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores were evaluated during the follow-up. Results Seventy-two patients with an average follow-up of 30.4 months (range, 24–35 months) were included in this study. Thirty-three were in AR group and 39 in NAR group. The peak knee flexion torque was significant higher in AR group at 180°/s and 60°/s (P < 0.05 for both velocity) at 6 months postoperatively and showed no difference between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively. The isometric knee extension torque was significant higher in AR group at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05) and showed no difference between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively. No significant differences between AR group and NAR group were found regarding knee stability and subjective knee function evaluations at follow-up. Conclusions Compared with non-anatomical ACLR, anatomical ACLR showed a better recovery of hamstring and quadriceps strength at 6 months postoperatively. However, the discrepancy on hamstring and quadriceps strength between the two groups vanished at 1 year postoperatively.

Download Full-text

Femoral nerve versus adductor canal block for early postoperative pain control and knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autografts: a prospective single-blind randomised controlled trial

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery ◽

10.1007/s00402-021-03823-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Takahiro Ogura ◽

Hiroaki Omatsu ◽

Hideaki Fukuda ◽

Shigehiro Asai ◽

Chikara Saito ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Femoral Nerve ◽

Adductor Canal Block ◽

Postoperative Pain Control ◽

Adductor Canal ◽

Anterior Cruciate ◽

Randomised Controlled ◽

Single Blind

Download Full-text

STRONGER THAN EVER! ADOLESCENT ATHLETES SHOW STRENGTH GAINS WITHIN THE UNINJURED LEG AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967121s00050 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽

pp. 2325967121S0005

Author(s):

Elliot Greenberg ◽

Joshua Bram ◽

Theodore Ganley

Keyword(s):

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Cohort Analysis ◽

Peak Torque ◽

Quadriceps Strength ◽

Strength Assessment ◽

Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽

Anterior Cruciate

Background: The restoration of quadriceps strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is critical to restore optimal patient function and reduce the incidence of secondary ACL injury. Strength is typically quantified during return to sport assessments, by comparing the strength in the involved limb to that of the uninvolved limb. A limb symmetry index (LSI) is calculated and used to determine if any residual strength deficits persist. Recent evidence demonstrates that the uninvolved limb may lose strength during ACLR recovery and suggests that pre-operative uninvolved limb strength values may offer a better representation and more stringent indicator of strength recovery after ACLR. However, this body of literature is limited and no studies have specifically evaluated this occurrence within youth athletes. Purpose: To evaluate the change in strength in the uninvolved limb from pre-operative to 6 months post-ACLR, and assess the effect of pre-operative strength comparison on 6-month post-op LSI. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of pediatric patients (≤18 years) undergoing primary ACLR from 1/2018-1/2020 without concomitant multi-ligamentous reconstruction was conducted. Isokinetic peak torque values for the uninvolved and involved quadriceps were extracted at pre-operative (uninvolved only) and 6 months post-operative. Strength changes were analyzed using paired-samples t-test. Results: Complete data was available for a total of 17 subjects (mean age 15.1±1.7, 53% female). Pre-operative strength assessment was performed a mean of 11.5 days (range 1-26) prior to surgery. The mean 6-month post-operative assessment occurred at 177 days (range 127-246). The uninvolved limb was significantly stronger (p<0.001) at 6 months compared to preoperatively, with a mean improvement of 12.1ft/lbs (95%CI 18.3 – 7.2) with a change from 82.4ft/lbs to 95.1 ft/lbs. The LSI was calculated using both pre-operative and 6-month post-operative uninvolved limb values and demonstrated substantially lower LSI values when using concurrent 6-month data (LSIpre 91.3% vs LSI6M 76.9%). Conclusions: Among this sample, the uninvolved limb got stronger during post-ACLR recovery and comparison to concurrently assessed strength values led to a more stringent determination of LSI. Differences in rehabilitation programming, adolescent physiology, and pre-injury training patterns may explain why these results differ than those found in older cohorts.

Download Full-text