Review of cadaveric dating methods and new perspectives from the necrobiome

Author(s):  
Ángel M. Aragonés ◽  
Silvana Teresa Tapia-Paniagua
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qinghe NIU ◽  
Jianjun QU ◽  
Benli LIU ◽  
Junzhan WANG ◽  
Shengbo XIE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
EVE KRAKOWSKI ◽  
SACHA STERN

Abstract Halper 331 is the fragment of a codex that has been styled the ‘oldest dated document of the Cairo Genizah’. It preserves the opening of a Jewish legal document dated to the year 1182 (Seleucid era), which appears to have been copied into this codex, probably as a formulary, not long after this date, in the late 9th century. In this article, the text of this fragment, in Aramaic and Hebrew, is edited, and its identification as the beginning of a marriage contract (ketubbah) is evaluated. Its Egyptian provenance is questioned, partly because the earliest evidence for the introduction of the Seleucid era by Jews in Egypt dates from the mid-10th century. The article surveys the history of Jewish dating methods in early medieval Egypt and the Near East, in an attempt to clarify this question. The specific date of the document deviates from the rabbinic calendar, but agrees with that of the contemporary Jewish Near Eastern sectarian groups of Abū ʿImrān al-Tiflīsī and Ismāʿīl al-ʿUkbarī; this document could thus uniquely attest one of these sectarian Jewish calendars.


2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 622-631
Author(s):  
Konrad Schmid

AbstractThe book »How Old Is the Hebrew Bible?« by Ronald Hendel and Jan Joosten is an apt introduction to dating biblical texts linguistically. However, this approach is not capable to reliably determine how old the texts and writings of the Hebrew Bible are. Rather, different dating methods need to be balanced against each other in order to get sound results in that respect.


Antiquity ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 84 (323) ◽  
pp. 202-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.G.L. Baillie

Good archaeology relies on ever more precise dates – obtainable, notably, from ice-cores and dendrochronology. These each provide year-by-year sequences, but they must be anchored at some point to real historical time, by a documented volcanic eruption, for example. But what if the dating methods don't agree? Here the author throws down the gauntlet to the ice-core researchers – their assigned dates are several years too old, probably due to the spurious addition of ‘uncertain’ layers. Leave these out and the two methods correlate exactly…


Author(s):  
Carolyn Dillian

This article discusses the current status of archaeological obsidian studies, including techniques used in characterization and sourcing studies, obsidian hydration, and regional syntheses. It begins with an overview of obsidian and the unique formation processes that create it before turning to a discussion of the significance of characterization and sourcing techniques for understanding prehistoric obsidian trade and exchange. It then considers the problematic aspects of the term “sourcing,” despite its ubiquitous use in archaeology and archaeometry, along with the use of X-ray fluorescence in the chemical characterization of obsidian. It also explores obsidian hydration dating methods and equations, factors that can affect the date assignments for hydration specimens, and the various uses of obsidian in prehistoric times. Finally, it addresses some important questions relating to obsidian research and suggests new directions in the field.


2019 ◽  
pp. 191-237
Author(s):  
Giulio Fanti ◽  
Pierandrea Malfi
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document