Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with municipal solid waste leachate: A review and prospective application with more benefits

2021 ◽  
Vol 174 ◽  
pp. 105832
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Lv ◽  
Ning Chang ◽  
Yu-You Li ◽  
Jianyong Liu
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Malik Muhammad Hassan ◽  
Noor Haleem ◽  
Muhammad Anwar Baig ◽  
Yousuf Jamal

Abstract Grasses have been used widely to remediate contaminants present in domestic wastewater, but leachate generated from municipal solid waste that usually contain some concentrations of heavy metals has never been reported to be treated with grasses, especially Rhodes grass. A series of experiments was performed to investigate the contaminant uptake from municipal solid waste leachate by Chloris gayana (Rhodes grass) grown in combination with two commonly available grass varieties namely Vetiveria zizanioides (Vetiver grass) and Pennisetum purpureum (Elephant grass). Leachate used for the experiments had high values for chemical oxygen demand (5 g/L), pH (8.5), electrical conductivity (9.0 mS/cm), nitrates (182.1 mg/L), phosphates 6.4 mg/L along with heavy metals i.e. copper, zinc and manganese. Different dilutions of leachate ranging from 0 to 100% were applied in batches and their result showed that collectively all the grasses reduced overall contaminant concentrations. These were reported for chemical oxygen demand, electrical conductivity, nitrates, and phosphates reduced up to 67, 94, 94, and 73%, respectively. Metals uptake by grasses also showed a significant decrease in applied dose i.e. zinc (97%), copper (89%), and manganese (89%). Plant analysis showed that all grasses showed preference to heavy metals uptake e.g. Rhodes grass favoured up taking zinc, Elephant grass for copper and Vetiver grass preferred manganese. Overall growth performance of Rhodes grass was better in dilute leachate, whereas in more concentrated leachate, Rhodes grass did not perform better and production of biomass decreased. In Vetiver grass, root and shoot lengths decreased with increasing leachate strength, but the biomass did not change significantly.


1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Borzacconi ◽  
I. López ◽  
M. Ohanian ◽  
M. Viñas

1985 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry E. Haxo ◽  
Richard M. White ◽  
Paul D. Haxo ◽  
Michael A. Fong

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document