scholarly journals Uplift capacity of horizontal strip plate anchors adjacent to slopes considering seismic loadings

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 998-1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Ganesh ◽  
Jagdish Prasad Sahoo
Géotechnique ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-42
Author(s):  
Anamitra Roy ◽  
Shiao Huey Chow ◽  
Mark F. Randolph ◽  
Conleth D. O'Loughlin

2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 692-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil M. Rangari ◽  
Deepankar Choudhury ◽  
D.M. Dewaikar

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 801-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Rahimi ◽  
S.N. Moghaddas Tafreshi ◽  
B. Leshchinsky ◽  
A.R. Dawson

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 648-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Ilamparuthi ◽  
E A Dickin ◽  
K Muthukrisnaiah

An experimental investigation of the uplift behaviour of relatively large scale model circular plate anchors up to 400 mm in diameter embedded in loose, medium-dense, and dense dry sand is described. Uplift capacity is strongly influenced by anchor diameter, embedment ratio, and sand density. In tests on shallow half-cut models, a gently curved rupture surface emerged from the top edge of the anchor to the sand surface at approximately ϕ/2 to the vertical, where ϕ is the angle of shearing resistance. For a deep anchor, a balloon-shaped rupture surface emerged at 0.8ϕ to the vertical immediately above the anchor and was confined within the sand bed. The load-displacement behaviour of full-shaped models was three-phase and two-phase for shallow and deep anchors, respectively. Alternative methods of determining the critical embedment ratio are considered, and values of 4.8, 5.9, and 6.8 are proposed for loose, medium-dense, and dense sand, respectively. Empirical equations are presented which yield breakout factors similar to those from many published laboratory and field studies.Key words: circular anchor, uplift capacity, sand, critical embedment ratio, failure mechanism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document