Random forest analysis of tracheal breathing sounds for predicting obstructive sleep apnea

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. S142-S143
Author(s):  
F. Hajipour ◽  
M. Jafari Jozani ◽  
Z. Moussavi
SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A224-A225
Author(s):  
S Kim ◽  
K Yang

Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to develop a predicting model for the moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by using advanced tree models. Methods We retrospectively investigated the medical records of patients who undertaken overnight polysomnography (PSG) at our sleep disorders center. We divided the data to a training set (70%) and a test set (30%), randomly. We made a random forest and a XGBoost model to predict the moderate-to-severe OSA (apnea hyponea index [AHI] ≥ 15/h) by using the training set, and then applied each models to the test set. To compare the fitness of the models, we used an accuracy, and an area under curve (AUC). Results Finally, 1,426 patients (AHI < 5:AHI ≥ 15= 464:962) were enrolled. The random forest model showed an accuracy of 0.79, and AUC of 0.82. In the random forest model, the sleep apnea scale of the sleep disorders questionnaire (SA-SDQ), age, neck circumference, male sex, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, and hyperlipidemia appeared in order of a variance importance. The XGBoost model showed an accuracy of 0.75 and AUC of 0.79. Conclusion The random forest model to predict moderate-to-severe OSA showed better performance compared to the XGBoost model. The further study for validation is required. Support None


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 878-892
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Napoli ◽  
Linda D. Vallino

Purpose The 2 most commonly used operations to treat velopharyngeal inadequacy (VPI) are superiorly based pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty, both of which may result in hyponasal speech and airway obstruction. The purpose of this article is to (a) describe the bilateral buccal flap revision palatoplasty (BBFRP) as an alternative technique to manage VPI while minimizing these risks and (b) conduct a systematic review of the evidence of BBFRP on speech and other clinical outcomes. A report comparing the speech of a child with hypernasality before and after BBFRP is presented. Method A review of databases was conducted for studies of buccal flaps to treat VPI. Using the principles of a systematic review, the articles were read, and data were abstracted for study characteristics that were developed a priori. With respect to the case report, speech and instrumental data from a child with repaired cleft lip and palate and hypernasal speech were collected and analyzed before and after surgery. Results Eight articles were included in the analysis. The results were positive, and the evidence is in favor of BBFRP in improving velopharyngeal function, while minimizing the risk of hyponasal speech and obstructive sleep apnea. Before surgery, the child's speech was characterized by moderate hypernasality, and after surgery, it was judged to be within normal limits. Conclusion Based on clinical experience and results from the systematic review, there is sufficient evidence that the buccal flap is effective in improving resonance and minimizing obstructive sleep apnea. We recommend BBFRP as another approach in selected patients to manage VPI. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9919352


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document