Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Romania and sensitivity analysis: A case of joint consideration of intermediate-depth (Vrancea) and shallow (crustal) seismicity

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 364-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Yu Sokolov ◽  
Friedemann Wenzel ◽  
Rakesh Mohindra
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 7901
Author(s):  
Rashad Sawires ◽  
José A. Peláez ◽  
Mohamed Hamdache

A probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in terms of peak ground acceleration (PGA) and spectral acceleration (SA) values, for both 10% and 5% probability of exceedance in 50 years, has been performed for the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Bahrain. To do that, an updated, unified, and Poissonian earthquake catalog (since 685 to 2019) was prepared for this work. Three alternative seismic source models were considered in a designed logic-tree framework. The discrimination between the shallow and intermediate depth seismicity along the Zagros and the Makran regions was also considered in this assessment. Three alternative ground-motion attenuation models for crustal earthquakes and one additional for intermediate-depth ones have been selected and applied in this study, considering the predominant stress regime computed previously for each defined source. This assessment highlights that the maximum obtained hazard values are observed in the northeastern part of the studied region, specifically at Ras Al-Khaimah, Umm Al-Quwain, and Fujaira, being characterized by mean PGA and SA (0.2 s) pair values equal to (0.13 g, 0.30 g), (0.12 g, 0.29 g), and (0.13 g, 0.28 g), respectively, for a 475-year return period and for B/C National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) boundary site conditions. Seismic hazard deaggregation in terms of magnitude and distance was also computed for a return period of 475 years, for ten emirates and cities, and for four different spectral periods.


1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitzan Rabinowitz ◽  
David M. Steinberg ◽  
Gideon Leonard

This article explains the essential duality between logic tree analysis and sensitivity analysis in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment. The results of a logic tree analysis can be used to carry out a sensitivity analysis. More important, a preliminary sensitivity analysis can be used to focus attention on those parameters that have the largest effects on assessed hazard. This information can be of great value in the construction of a logic tree. Thus we advocate a two-stage process that begins with a sensitivity analysis and then proceeds to the construction of a logic tree.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Etoundi Delair Dieudonné Ndibi ◽  
Eddy Ferdinand Mbossi ◽  
Nguet Pauline Wokwenmendam ◽  
Bekoa Ateba ◽  
Théophile Ndougsa-Mbarga

2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 1316-1327 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Beauval ◽  
H. Yepes ◽  
L. Audin ◽  
A. Alvarado ◽  
J.-M. Nocquet ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document