Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with minimally invasive nuclear decompression

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Derby ◽  
Ray M. Baker ◽  
Chang-Hyung Lee
2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 479-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Cahana ◽  
Philippe Mavrocordatos ◽  
Jos WM Geurts ◽  
Gerbrand J Groen

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yumeng Li ◽  
Daniel Lubelski ◽  
Kalil G. Abdullah ◽  
Thomas E. Mroz ◽  
Michael P. Steinmetz

Object Bertolotti's syndrome consists of low-back pain caused by lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTVs) and LSTV-associated biomechanical spinal changes. There is a lack of consensus regarding the cause, clinical significance, and treatment of this condition. The authors aim to characterize the clinical presentation of patients with Bertolotti's syndrome and describe a minimally invasive surgical treatment for this condition. Methods Seven patients who underwent minimally invasive paramedian tubular-based resection of the LSTV for Bertolotti's syndrome were identified over the course of 5 years. Diagnosis was based on patient history of chronic low-back pain, radiographic findings of LSTV, and pain relief on trigger-site injection with steroid and/or anesthetics. Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify demographics, operative data, and outcomes. Results All patients presented with severe, chronic low-back pain lasting an average of 8 years that was resistant to nonoperative care. At presentation, 6 (86%) of 7 patients experienced radicular pain that was ipsilateral to the LSTV. Radiographic evidence showed a presence of LSTV in all patients on the left (43%), right (29%), or bilaterally (29%). Degenerative disc changes at the L4–5 level immediately above the anomalous LSTV were observed in 6 of 7 (86%) patients; these changes were not seen at the level below the LSTV. Following pseudo-joint injection, all patients experienced temporary relief of their symptoms. All patients underwent a minimally invasive, paramedian tubular-based approach for resection of the LSTV. Three (43%) of 7 patients reported complete resolution of low-back pain, 2 (29%) of 7 patients had reduced low-back pain, and 2 patients (29%) experienced initial relief but return of low-back pain at 1 and 4 years postoperatively. Three (50%) of the 6 patients with radicular pain had complete relief of this symptom. The median follow-up time was 12 months. No intraoperative complication was reported. Two (29%) of 7 patients developed postoperative complications including one with a wound hematoma and another with new L-5 radiculopathy that resolved 2 years after surgery. Conclusions Diagnosis of Bertolotti's syndrome should be considered with adequate patient history, imaging studies, and diagnostic injections. A minimally invasive surgical approach for resection of the LSTV is presented here for symptomatic treatment of select patients with Bertolotti's syndrome whose conditions are refractory to conventional therapy and who have pain that can be attributed to the LSTV. Several short-term complications were noted with this procedure, but overall this procedure is effective for treating symptoms related to Bertolotti's syndrome.


Pain Medicine ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roelof M. A. W. Van Wijk ◽  
Jos W. M. Geurts ◽  
Richel Lousberg ◽  
Herman J. Wynne ◽  
Edwin Hammink ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Gkiatas ◽  
Ioannis Gelalis ◽  
Antonios Spiliotis ◽  
Dimitrios Papadopoulos ◽  
Emilios Pakos ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 184 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 537-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Cohen ◽  
Christopher Gilmore ◽  
Leonardo Kapural ◽  
Steven Hanling ◽  
Anthony Plunkett ◽  
...  

Abstract Chronic low back pain represents one of the most common sources of disability and a significant healthcare burden for the U.S. military. Present treatments for chronic back pain are often ineffective, poorly tolerated, invasive, destructive, and/or associated with complications and lead to the progression to invasive surgical procedures. There have been multiple calls for the development of a minimally invasive system that is effective without the risks or complications of existing surgical therapies, which could prevent the need for surgery and the recurrence of pain. The goal of this study was to evaluate a novel, minimally invasive approach using a percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) system designed to provide pain relief without surgery, to reduce complications, and provide a less-invasive treatment option. In nine subjects, percutaneous PNS improved participants’ function, as evidenced by clinically and statistically significant reductions in pain, disability, and pain interference. Subjects also experienced reductions in opioid and non-opioid analgesic medication usage and reported improvements in quality of life with treatment. There were no serious or unanticipated adverse events. These results demonstrate the potential of percutaneous PNS as a non-surgical therapy to treat chronic back pain without opioids.


Neurographics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
A. Chacko Achanaril ◽  
M.D. Jhaveri ◽  
S. Gaddikeri

Chronic low back pain point prevalence in US adults ages 20‐69 years is approximately 13.1%. It is estimated that approximately 12%‐15% of visits to health care providers in the United States are related to low back pain and is considered as an economic burden, not only due to the loss of work productivity but also due to direct health care costs, with an estimated median treatment cost of approximately $13,015 per quality-adjusted life year. Even with well-selected patients, the surgical outcome in patients with low back pain may vary. Conservative management by using physical therapy and rehabilitation is considered an equally good alternative option for patients with chronic low back pain. Percutaneous minimally invasive pain-alleviating spinal procedures are helpful for patients who do not have a compelling indication for surgical intervention, who are not good surgical candidates due to their associated comorbidities, and who cannot tolerate the oral pain medications in the required doses. Percutaneous minimally invasive pain-alleviating spinal procedures are increasingly popular due to increasing patient awareness of alternative treatment options and also the skepticism about the cost-effective role of spinal surgery for pain. In this article, we provide a basic review of relevant anatomy, preprocedure assessment, and techniques for most commonly used percutaneous image-guided spinal epidural procedures and briefly discuss the potential complications.Learning Objectives: To describe relevant spinal anatomy; to provide a brief illustration of basic techniques and approaches for spinal pain control procedures and regional anesthesia; and to discuss predisposing factors, pathophysiology, and imaging features of associated complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document