A report on the early results of the BacJac interspinous distraction device: a prospective study in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. S77-S78
Author(s):  
Sriram Harish Srinivasan ◽  
Martyn Newey
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Distraction Device ◽  
Interspinous Distraction ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
A Prospective Study

A prospective study of non-surgical versus surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis without instability

2020 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. 100-107
Author(s):  
Jong-myung Jung ◽  
Seung-Jae Hyun ◽  
Ki-Jeong Kim ◽  
Chi Heon Kim ◽  
Chun Kee Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
A Prospective Study

scholarly journals Do intra-operative neurophysiological changes predict functional outcome following decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis? A prospective study

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Piasecki ◽  
Gerit Kulik ◽  
Katarzyna Pierzchala ◽  
Etienne Pralong ◽  
Prashanth J. Rao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Decompressive Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
A Prospective Study

scholarly journals Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with microdecompression and interspinous distraction device insertion. A case series

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avraam Ploumis ◽  
Pavlos Christodoulou ◽  
Dimitrios Kapoutsis ◽  
Ioannis Gelalis ◽  
Vasilios Vraggalas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Distraction Device ◽  
Interspinous Distraction ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

scholarly journals Treatment of the Moderate Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with an Intespinous Distraction Device IMPALA

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-116
Author(s):  
Haso Sefo ◽  
Mersad Barucija ◽  
Edin Hajdarpasic ◽  
Mirsad Muftic
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Clinical Evaluations ◽  
Distraction Device ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Interspinous Distraction ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Introduction: The aim of this study was the evaluation of symptom improvements in patients with moderate lumbar spinal stenosis, who consecutively underwent placement of interspinous distraction deviceIMPALA®.Methods: This study included a total of 11 adult patients with moderate lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical evaluations were performed preoperatively and 3-months after surgery using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).Results: The mean preoperative VAS was 7.09 and fell to 2.27 a 3-months after surgery. The mean preoperative ODI was 59.45 fell to 20.72 a 3-months after surgery.Conclusions: Using the IMPALA® device in patients with moderate lumbar spinal stenosis is a minimal invasive, effective and safe procedure. Clinical symptoms were improved 3 months after surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document