Soil quality response to tillage and crop residue removal under subarctic conditions

2006 ◽  
Vol 91 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 15-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen D. Sparrow ◽  
Carol E. Lewis ◽  
Charles W. Knight
Keyword(s):  
Soil Quality ◽  
Crop Residue ◽  
Residue Removal ◽  
Crop Residue Removal ◽  
Quality Response

Crop residue removal and soil erosion by wind

2017 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 97A-104A ◽  
Author(s):  
Humberto Blanco-Canqui ◽  
Charles Wortmann
Keyword(s):  
Soil Erosion ◽  
Crop Residue ◽  
Residue Removal ◽  
Crop Residue Removal

Sugarcane Green Harvest Effects on Arthropod Ground Predators and Lesser Cornstalk Borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) Damage

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 462-468
Author(s):  
Hardev Sandhu ◽  
Ron Cherry ◽  
Mubashar Nadeem
Keyword(s):  
Crop Residue ◽  
Pitfall Traps ◽  
Ratoon Crop ◽  
Residue Removal ◽  
Arthropod Predators ◽  
Crop Residue Removal ◽  
Elasmopalpus Lignosellus ◽  
Sugarcane Yield ◽  
Lepidoptera Pyralidae ◽  
Residue Levels

Abstract A field trial was conducted to determine the effects of harvest method (green cane harvest versus preharvest burning) and different crop residue removal treatments on the populations of ground-inhabiting arthropod predators and Elasmopalpus lignosellus (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in the first ratoon crop. Neither preharvest burning nor percentage crop residue removal after green cane harvest had any significant effect on the numbers of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) (F = 1.00; df = 4; P = 0.412) or spiders (Araneae) (F = 0.08; df = 4; P = 0.921) captured in pitfall traps. In contrast, crop residue levels remaining after green cane harvest significantly impacted E. lignosellus damage to the ratoon crop, with increased damage associated with lower levels of residue. Removal of ≥66% of the crop residue caused a significant (F = 132.68; df = 3; P < 0.001) increase in E. lignosellus damage that would likely reduce sugarcane yield, while 33% of the residue could be removed without increasing damage. Overall, our data indicate that green cane harvesting will not affect arthropod ground predators but may reduce the risk of E. lignosellus damage.

Effect of Crop Residue Removal and Straw Addition on Nitrous Oxide Emissions from a Horticulturally Used Soil in South Germany

2019 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 1399-1409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perik Seiz ◽  
Ivan Guzman-Bustamante ◽  
Rudolf Schulz ◽  
Torsten Müller ◽  
Reiner Ruser
Keyword(s):  
Nitrous Oxide ◽  
Crop Residue ◽  
Nitrous Oxide Emissions ◽  
Residue Removal ◽  
Crop Residue Removal

Crop residue removal effects on soil carbon: Measured and inter-model comparisons

2012 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 27-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.N. Smith ◽  
B.B. Grant ◽  
C.A. Campbell ◽  
B.G. McConkey ◽  
R.L. Desjardins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Crop Residue ◽  
Model Comparisons ◽  
Residue Removal ◽  
Crop Residue Removal

Crop residue removal and nitrification inhibitor application as strategies to mitigate N2O emissions in sugarcane fields

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. 206-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leandro Carolino Gonzaga ◽  
João Luís Nunes Carvalho ◽  
Bruna Gonçalves de Oliveira ◽  
Johnny Rodrigues Soares ◽  
Heitor Cantarella
Keyword(s):  
Crop Residue ◽  
Nitrification Inhibitor ◽  
N2o Emissions ◽  
Residue Removal ◽  
Crop Residue Removal
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document