scholarly journals Crop Residue Removal and Soil Productivity with No-Till Corn, Sorghum, and Soybean

1984 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 640-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Doran ◽  
W. W. Wilhelm ◽  
J. F. Power
Agriculture ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 265
Author(s):  
Jin Zhang ◽  
Lan-Fang Wu

Weeds are often harmful to crop growth due to the competition for space and resources. A field experiment containing four treatments with three replications in a complete randomized design was conducted at Yucheng Comprehensive Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences since 2008 to assess the impact of shifting from conventional tillage to no-till with crop residue management on weeds and wheat production at the North China Plain. We found that both aboveground weed density and species richness were higher under continuous no-till (NT) than conventional tillage (CT) in the regrowth and stem elongation stage of wheat growth. On the other hand, aboveground weed density in the stage of flowering and filling decreased with crop residue mulching. The density of the soil seed bank in crop residue removal treatments was significantly higher than that of crop residue retention. Besides, either crop residue mulching or incorporating into the soil significantly increased the wheat yield compared with crop residue removal regardless of tillage management. In conclusion, crop residue retention could decrease the weed density and species richness both aboveground and in the soil seed bank and inhibit the growth of broadleaf weeds by the residue layer. Moreover, crop residue retention could improve the wheat yield.


2017 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 97A-104A ◽  
Author(s):  
Humberto Blanco-Canqui ◽  
Charles Wortmann

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 462-468
Author(s):  
Hardev Sandhu ◽  
Ron Cherry ◽  
Mubashar Nadeem

Abstract A field trial was conducted to determine the effects of harvest method (green cane harvest versus preharvest burning) and different crop residue removal treatments on the populations of ground-inhabiting arthropod predators and Elasmopalpus lignosellus (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in the first ratoon crop. Neither preharvest burning nor percentage crop residue removal after green cane harvest had any significant effect on the numbers of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) (F = 1.00; df = 4; P = 0.412) or spiders (Araneae) (F = 0.08; df = 4; P = 0.921) captured in pitfall traps. In contrast, crop residue levels remaining after green cane harvest significantly impacted E. lignosellus damage to the ratoon crop, with increased damage associated with lower levels of residue. Removal of ≥66% of the crop residue caused a significant (F = 132.68; df = 3; P < 0.001) increase in E. lignosellus damage that would likely reduce sugarcane yield, while 33% of the residue could be removed without increasing damage. Overall, our data indicate that green cane harvesting will not affect arthropod ground predators but may reduce the risk of E. lignosellus damage.


2006 ◽  
Vol 91 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 15-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen D. Sparrow ◽  
Carol E. Lewis ◽  
Charles W. Knight

2019 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 1399-1409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perik Seiz ◽  
Ivan Guzman-Bustamante ◽  
Rudolf Schulz ◽  
Torsten Müller ◽  
Reiner Ruser

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document