Imaging of the Cervical Spine in Injured Patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
James T. Quann ◽  
Richard A. Sidwell
1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Perugini ◽  
M. G. Bonetti ◽  
S. Ghirlanda ◽  
A. Fresina ◽  
U. Salvolini

Author(s):  
James W. Davis ◽  
Krista L. Kaups ◽  
Mark A. Cunningham ◽  
Steven N. Parks ◽  
Thomas P. Nowak ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 630-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Thomas Stelfox ◽  
George C. Velmahos ◽  
Elise Gettings ◽  
Luca M. Bigatello ◽  
Ulrich Schmidt

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 1801-1810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Platzer ◽  
Manuela Jaindl ◽  
Gerhild Thalhammer ◽  
Stefan Dittrich ◽  
Thomas Wieland ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
pp. 157-175
Author(s):  
Srikanth Sridhar ◽  
Carin A. Hagberg

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric M. Horn ◽  
Gregory P. Lekovic ◽  
Iman Feiz-Erfan ◽  
Volker K. H. Sonntag ◽  
Nicholas Theodore

Object. Identifying instability of the cervical spine can be difficult in traumatically injured patients. The goal of this study was to determine whether cervical abnormalities demonstrated on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are predictive of spinal instability. Methods. Data in all patients admitted through the Level I trauma service at the authors' institution who had undergone cervical MR imaging were retrospectively reviewed. The reasons for MR imaging screening were neurological deficit, fracture, neck pain, and indeterminate clinical examination (for example, coma). Abnormal soft-tissue (prevertebral or paraspinal) findings on MR imaging were correlated with those revealed on computerized tomography (CT) scanning and plain and dynamic radiography to determine the presence/absence of cervical instability. Of 6328 patients admitted through the trauma service, 314 underwent MR imaging of the cervical spine. Of 166 patients in whom CT scanning or radiography demonstrated normal findings, 70 had undergone MR imaging that revealed abnormal findings. Of these 70 patients, 23 underwent dynamic imaging, the findings of which were normal. In each case of cervical instability (65 patients) CT, radiographic, and MR imaging studies demonstrated abnormalities. Furthermore, there were 143 patients with abnormal CT or radiographic study findings, in 13 of whom MR imaging revealed normal findings. Six of the latter underwent dynamic testing, which demonstrated normal results. Conclusions. Magnetic resonance imaging is sensitive to soft-tissue injuries of the cervical spine. When CT scanning and radiography detect no fractures or signs of instability, MR imaging does not help in determining cervical stability and may lead to unnecessary testing when not otherwise indicated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document