Radiation therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A review

Surgery ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin M. Turner ◽  
Aaron M. Delman ◽  
Jordan R. Kharofa ◽  
Milton T. Smith ◽  
Kyuran A. Choe ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 302-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Hattori ◽  
Tsutomu Fujii ◽  
Masaya Suenaga ◽  
Suguru Yamada ◽  
Mitsuro Kanda ◽  
...  

302 Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) with S-1 (oral fluoropyrimidine) followed by surgery for the treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer that involved the major visceral artery or the portal venous system. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with pancreatic cancers that abutted the SMA in 10, the CHA in 7, the both SMA and CHA in 1, and occluded the SMV/PV in 10 were treated with NACRT at a single institution. Radiation therapy was delivered at a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 80 mg/m(2)/day for 14 consecutive days followed by a 7-day rest period during radiation therapy. After radiotherapy and 2 courses of S-1, restaging was done to evaluate secondary resectability. Results: Of the all patients, 25 underwent a full course of NACRT, and NACRT terminated in 3 patients because of grade 3 leukopenia in 2 and tumor bleeding in 1. Partial response was achieved in 3 patients and stable disease in 22. Twenty-four patients (86%) underwent surgical resection, and all had margin-negative (R0) resections. Only two patients (8%) had major morbidity as Clavien-Dindo’s classification III or more, and there was no operative or in-hospital mortality. Pathological examination revealed that more than 50% of tumor cells had disappeared in 14 cases and all cases achieved Evans’ score IIa and more. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with S-1 was feasible and promising therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer that involves the major artery or the portal venous system.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 320-320
Author(s):  
Nicholas Figura ◽  
Alex Cruz ◽  
Eric Albert Mellon ◽  
Michael Chuong ◽  
Sarah Hoffe ◽  
...  

320 Background: To date there have been few studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of aggressive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT) for patients ≥70 years of age with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of our institutional experience treating BRPC from 2006 to June 2012. All patients were staged with a pancreas protocol CT scan, endoscopic ultrasound, and PET/CT scan. The diagnosis of BRPC was confirmed by our GI Tumor Board prior to treatment. Our institutional preference for preoperative chemotherapy included gemcitabine, paclitaxel and capecitabine (GTX). RT techniques included intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Restaging scans were performed after RT completion and patients were then considered for surgical resection. The data was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. Results: This study included 72 BRPC patients with a median age of 65 years (range 36-87). 24 patients (33%) were ≥70 years old. Median follow up for all patients was 12.7 months. 56 patients (77%) received preoperative GTX. Of the patients ≥70 years, 7 were treated with IMRT and 17 with SBRT, compared to 8 who were treated with IMRT and 40 with SBRT in the younger cohort. In the older group, 11 patients (46%) underwent surgery with all attaining microscopically negative margins (R0), compared with 32 patients that underwent surgery in the younger cohort (61.7%), 29 of which received R0 margins (90.6%). Median survival for patients ≥70 years old was 12.6 months compared to 12.8 months for the younger patients. There was no difference in overall survival (p =.606) or progression free survival (p = .312) between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that surgery in the entire group was significantly associated with an improvement in overall survival (p = .011). Conclusions: Our data indicates that aggressive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and RT is equally effective for older patients. Neoadjuvant therapy for BRPC should not be withheld basely solely on patient age.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 302-302
Author(s):  
M. D. Chuong ◽  
R. Shridhar ◽  
M. Patel ◽  
J. Klapman ◽  
J. S. Barthel ◽  
...  

302 Background: Our institution has reported a strategy of using neoadjuvant GTX (gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine) chemotherapy followed by 5FU-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for borderline resectable pancreas cancer. We now report our early experience with induction chemotherapy followed by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods: This retrospective review evaluates our initial 5 fraction SBRT experience in 15 patients following induction chemotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Staging included pancreatic protocol CT, endoscopic ultrasound, and PET/CT scan. Induction regimens consisted of GTX for 3 cycles in 12 patients and gemcitabine alone in 3. Daily SBRT was delivered to the pancreas at least 1 week after completing systemic chemotherapy. Endoscopically implanted fiducial markers and daily cone beam CT were used for image guidance. Treatment was delivered on a Varian Trilogy unit using 6-15 MV photons. Doses were selected based on dose painting the portion of tumor adjacent to the vasculature to a higher dose while meeting normal tissue constraints. The entire gross tumor received a dose of 5-6 Gy per fraction while the portion of the tumor adjacent to the vasculature resulting in the borderline designation received up to 8 Gy per fraction. Patients were re-imaged 3-4 weeks after SBRT for consideration of surgery. Results: There were no acute or late grade 3 toxicities. At the time of this analysis, not all treated patients have reached the restaging time point, but 9 of 15 (60%) were candidates for resection. Six patients have gone to resection with negative margins and without any increased complications. Two patients were found to have disease surrounding the vasculature preventing resection. One patient had cardiac issues at surgery and resection was aborted. One patient was explored and found to have liver metastases. Conclusions: Integration of SBRT in conjunction with systemic therapy is well-tolerated and appears to facilitate margin-negative resection in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 327-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Vignesh ◽  
S. E. Hoffe ◽  
R. Shridhar ◽  
J. Klapman ◽  
J. S. Barthel

327 Background: Fiducial markers implanted into tumors that move with respiration facilitate planning for SBRT. To date, there is little evidence regarding the safety and utility of EUS implanted markers for “borderline resectable” pancreatic cancer. Methods: This is a retrospective review of 13 patients (7 men and 6 women) with “borderline resectable” pancreatic cancer as per NCCN guidelines. EUS-guided fiducial placement for stereotactic body radiation therapy was performed between January 2009 and September 2010. Gold cylindrical fiducials (0.35mmx 10mm or 0.75 mm X 10 mm; VISICOIL) were loaded into a 22g or 19 g EUS needle. With the needle in the target, the fiducial was deployed by retracting the needle and advancing the stylet. EUS confirmed fiducial position after deployment. A mean of 3 fiducials were placed (range 1-6) per patient. Fiducial position was analyzed at 4D CT simulation and daily cone beam imaging prior to SBRT. Results: Fiducial placement was successful in all. Technical difficulty was encountered in 2 patients secondary to retained food in stomach and uncinate tumors. Smaller (10x0.35mm) fiducials were successfully placed in these 2 patients. 3 patients had abdominal pain lasting < 12 hours after fiducial placement but none had any acute complications. In 2 patients, change in fiducial position was noted on follow-up cone beam CT. This apparent change in position was related to biliary drainage, gastric distension and a pre-existing pseudocyst. Though this is not indicative of fiducial migration, it impacts radiation planning and delivery. No complications were noted at the end of a mean follow-up period of 6 months. Conclusions: EUS fiducial placement to assist with stereotactic body radiation for “borderline resectable” pancreatic cancer is safe, feasible, and technically successful in most cases. True migration did not occur but other factors may cause an apparent change in fiducial position. Further studies are planned to optimize the best configuration of fiducial placement by virtue of tumor location for SBRT planning and treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document